Greedy Algorithms for Shortcut Sets and Hopsets

Ben Bals; Joakim Blikstad; Greg Bodwin; Daniel Dadush; Sebastian Forster; Yasamin Nazari

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.20111

Greedy Algorithms for Shortcut Sets and Hopsets

Ben Bals·Joakim Blikstad·Greg Bodwin·Daniel Dadush·Sebastian Forster·Yasamin Nazari

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For many popular graph metric sparsifiers, such as spanners, emulators, and preservers, simple and elegant greedy algorithms are known that achieve state-of-the-art or existentially optimal tradeoffs between size and quality. The goal of this paper is to develop and analyze comparable greedy algorithms for nearby objects in graph metric augmentation. We show the following: - A simple greedy algorithm for shortcut sets achieves the state-of-the-art size/hopbound tradeoff recently proved by Kogan and Parter (2022), up to $O(\log n)$ factors in the size. Moreover, with an additional preprocessing step, the greedy algorithm subpolynomially improves on the previous size bounds in some range of parameters. - The same greedy algorithm was already known to be existentially optimal for the size/hopbound tradeoff for hopsets, by an analysis of Berman, Raskhodnikova, and Ruan (2010) introduced for transitive-closure spanners. We provide a completely different analysis showing that the algorithm is also existentially optimal (up to $O(\log n)$ factors) for the matching hopset problem, in which one has a budget of roughly $O(m)$ additional edges (for an $m$-edge input graph).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Ben Bals, Joakim Blikstad, Greg Bodwin, Daniel Dadush, Sebastian Forster, Yasamin Nazari. 2025-11-25. Greedy Algorithms for Shortcut Sets and Hopsets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20111

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗