arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.14523

Teaching Longitudinal Linear Mixed Models End-to-End: A Reproducible Case Study in Mouse Body-Weight Growth

Sunday A. Adetunji
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background: Linear mixed-effects models are central for analyzing longitudinal continuous data, yet many learners meet them as scattered formulas or software output rather than as a coherent workflow. There is a need for a single, reproducible case study that links questions, model building, diagnostics, and interpretation. Methods: We reanalyze a published mouse body-weight experiment with 31 mice in three groups weighed weekly for 12 weeks. After reshaping the data to long format and using profile plots to motivate linear time trends, we fit three random-intercept linear mixed models: a common-slope model, a fully interacted group-by-time model, and a parsimonious model with group-specific intercepts, a shared slope for two groups, and an extra slope for the third. Models are compared using maximum likelihood, AIC, BIC, and likelihood ratio tests, and linear contrasts are used to estimate group differences in weekly means and 12 week gains. Results: The parsimonious model fits as well as the fully interacted model and clearly outperforms the common-slope model, revealing small and similar gains in two groups and much steeper growth in the third, with highly significant contrasts for excess weight gain. Interpretation: This case study gives a complete, executable workflow for longitudinal linear mixed modeling, from raw data and exploratory plots through model selection, diagnostics, and targeted contrasts. By making explicit the mapping from scientific questions to model terms and estimable contrasts, and by providing R code and a stepwise checklist, it serves as a practical template for teaching and applied work in biostatistics, epidemiology, and related fields

Explore related subjects

stat.MEq-bio.OT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sunday A. Adetunji. 2025-11-18. Teaching Longitudinal Linear Mixed Models End-to-End: A Reproducible Case Study in Mouse Body-Weight Growth. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14523

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗