arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2511.13810

Theory of Interpretations I. Foundations

Abstract

This is the first paper in a series in which we lay down the foundations of the theory of interpretations. We systematically study different types of interpretations and their properties. Some of these interpretations are known, while others are new. Each of them serves different purposes. In the last section, we describe applications of interpretations to Diophantine problems, first-order classification, isotypeness, definability of structures by types, elimination of imaginaries, richness, logical categories, and bi-interpretations with Z or N. Additionally, throughout the text, we pose some open questions that naturally arise in this context and provide the most typical examples, usually from algebra. The current literature is plagued by discrepancies and inconsistencies in definitions, concepts, and fundamental applications of interpretations. To address this, we thoroughly examine various principal notions, definitions, and arguments, bringing order to the existing theory. Simultaneously, we develop several key concepts, such as regular interpretations, regular bi-interpretations, and invertible interpretations, and outline their main applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Evelina Daniyarova, Alexei Myasnikov. 2025-11-17. Theory of Interpretations I. Foundations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13810

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO