arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.07441

AudAgent: Automated Auditing of Privacy Policy Compliance in AI Agents

Ye Zheng·Yimin Chen·Yidan Hu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AI agents can autonomously perform tasks and, often without explicit user consent, collect or disclose users' sensitive local data, which raises serious privacy concerns. Although AI agents' privacy policies describe their intended data practices, there remains limited transparency and accountability about whether runtime behavior matches those policies. To bridge this gap, we present AudAgent, a tool that continuously monitors AI agents' data practices in real time and guards compliance with their stated privacy policies. AudAgent comprises four components for automated privacy auditing of AI agents. (i) Policy formalization: a novel cross-LLM voting mechanism that ensures high-confidence parsing of privacy policies into formal models. (ii) Runtime annotation: a lightweight Presidio-based analyzer that detects sensitive data and annotates data practices based on the AI agent's context and the formalized privacy policy model. (iii) Compliance auditing: ontology graphs and automata-based checking that link the privacy policy model with runtime annotations, enabling on-the-fly compliance verification. (iv) User interface: an infrastructure-independent implementation that visualizes the real-time execution trace of AI agents alongside detected privacy violations, providing user-friendly transparency and accountability. We evaluate AudAgent on AI agents built with mainstream frameworks, demonstrating its effectiveness in detecting and visualizing privacy policy violations. Using AudAgent, we further find that many privacy policies lack explicit safeguards for highly sensitive data such as SSNs, whose misuse violates legal requirements, and that many agents, including those powered by Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek,do not refuse to process such data via third-party tools. AudAgent proactively blocks operations on such data, overriding the agents' original privacy policies and behavior.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ye Zheng, Yimin Chen, Yidan Hu. 2025-11-03. AudAgent: Automated Auditing of Privacy Policy Compliance in AI Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗