arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2511.07354

Dynamic Set Cover with Worst-Case Recourse

Abstract

In the dynamic set cover (SC) problem, the input is a dynamic universe of at most $n$ elements and a fixed collection of $m$ sets, where each element belongs to at most $f$ sets and each set has cost in $[1/C, 1]$. The objective is to efficiently maintain an approximate minimum SC under element updates; efficiency is primarily measured by the update time, but another important parameter is the recourse (number of changes to the solution per update). Ideally, one would like to achieve low worst-case bounds on both update time and recourse. One can achieve approximation $(1+\epsilon)\ln n$ (greedy-based) or $(1+\epsilon)f$ (primal-dual-based) with worst-case update time $O(f\log n)$ (ignoring $\epsilon$ dependencies). However, despite a large body of work, no algorithm with low update time (even amortized) and nontrivial worst-case recourse is known, even for unweighted instances ($C = 1$)! We remedy this by providing a transformation that, given as a black-box a SC algorithm with approximation $\alpha$ and update time $T$, returns a set cover algorithm with approximation $(2 + \epsilon)\alpha$, update time $O(T + \alpha C)$, and worst-case recourse $O(\alpha C)$. Our main results are obtained by leveraging this transformation for constant $C$:...

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shay Solomon, Amitai Uzrad. 2025-11-10. Dynamic Set Cover with Worst-Case Recourse. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07354

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS