arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.00254

Uncrossed Multiflows and Applications to Disjoint Paths

Chandra Chekuri·Guyslain Naves·Joseph Poremba·F. Bruce Shepherd
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A multiflow in a planar graph is uncrossed if its support paths do not cross. Recently such flows have played a role in approximation algorithms for maximum disjoint paths in "fully-planar" instances, where the combined supply-demand graph is planar, as well as low-congestion unsplittable flows for fully-planar and single-source instances. We investigate the utility of uncrossed flow more generally and ask three key questions. First, are there other interesting planar multiflow instances that admit uncrossed flows? We answer affirmatively, demonstrating a new family of "pairwise-planar" instances whose flows can be uncrossed. This family subsumes fully-planar but includes substantially more, such as fully-compliant series-parallel instances and some instances that have large clique demand graphs. Second, can we always round a fractional uncrossed flow to a "good" integral flow? We again answer positively. For maximization problems, we obtain integral flows with a constant fraction of the original value. For congestion problems (where we fully route all given demands), we obtain integral flows with edge congestion 2. Consequently, we obtain constant-factor approximation algorithms for maximum disjoint paths and minimum congestion integer multiflow for pairwise-planar instances, and show such instances have a constant integral flow-multicut gap. Finally, given a planar multiflow instance, can we determine if there exists a congestion-1 uncrossed fractional flow (congestion) or find the maximum value uncrossed fractional flow (maximization)? For congestion, we show this problem is NP-hard, but finding uncrossed edge-disjoint paths is polytime solvable if the demands span a bounded number of faces. For maximization, we present a strong inapproximability result.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chandra Chekuri, Guyslain Naves, Joseph Poremba, F. Bruce Shepherd. 2025-10-31. Uncrossed Multiflows and Applications to Disjoint Paths. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00254

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗