arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2510.23913

Expander Decomposition for Non-Uniform Vertex Measures

Abstract

A $(\phi,\epsilon)$-expander-decomposition of a graph $G$ (with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges) is a partition of $V$ into clusters $V_1,\ldots,V_k$ with conductance $\Phi(G[V_i]) \ge \phi$, such that there are $O(\epsilon m)$ inter-cluster edges. Such a decomposition plays a crucial role in many graph algorithms. [Agassy, Dorman, and Kaplan, ICALP 2023] (ADK) gave a randomized $\tilde{O}(m)$ time algorithm for computing a $(\phi, \phi\log^2 {n})$-expander decomposition. In this paper we generalize this result for a broader notion of expansion. Let $\mu \in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0 }^n$ be a vertex measure. A standard generalization of conductance of a cut $(S,\overline{S})$ is its $\mu$-expansion $\Phi^{\mu}_G(S,\overline{S}) = |E(S,\overline{S})|/\min \{\mu(S),\mu(\overline{S})\}$, where $\mu(S) = \sum_{v\in S} \mu(v)$. We present a randomized $\tilde{O}(m)$ time algorithm for computing a $(\phi, \phi \log^2 {n}\cdot\frac{\mu(V)}{m})$-expander decomposition with respect to $\mu$-expansion. A substantial portion of the exposition is adapted from ADK, and this work serves as a convenient reference for generalized expander decomposition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Agassy, Dani Dorfman, Haim Kaplan. 2025-10-27. Expander Decomposition for Non-Uniform Vertex Measures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23913

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS