The Five Safes as a Privacy Context

James Bailie; Ruobin Gong

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.05803

The Five Safes as a Privacy Context

James Bailie·Ruobin Gong

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Five Safes is a framework used by national statistical offices (NSO) for assessing and managing the disclosure risk of data sharing. It can be understood as a specialization of a broader concept--contextual integrity--to the situation of statistical dissemination by an NSO. We demonstrate this by mapping the five parameters of contextual integrity onto the five dimensions of the Five Safes. We also discuss how each of these two theories can address weaknesses in the other, thereby strengthening them both.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR cs.CY

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

James Bailie, Ruobin Gong. 2026-09-01. The Five Safes as a Privacy Context. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CR subject cs.CY subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2025

Security Science (SecSci), Basic Concepts and Mathematical Foundations

This textbook compiles the lecture notes from security courses taught at Oxford in the 2000s, at Royal Holloway in the 2010s, and currently in Hawaii. The early chapters are suitable for a first course in security. The middle chapters have been used in advanced courses. Towards the end there are also some research problems.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Beyond the Prank: The Hidden Expertise of TSS Scambaiters

This research studies how Technical Support Scams (TSS) are being countered by a uniquely dedicated community of volunteer counter-fraud operatives. Using a careful subject selection strategy, we interviewed 17 individuals who actively engage in TSS scambaiting activities in order to obtain insight into their motivations, the operational methods of the scammers they combat, the undocumented nuances of effective scambaiting action, and the various challenges scambaiters face. In our analysis, we find a community rich not only with insight into offenders, but with technical and operational expertise that is often lacking in research efforts targeting these same populations. At the same time, we find key areas where the community could be better supported and enabled. We discuss the implications of our findings for both future research and community protection strategies.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Effective Interventions Against AI-Enhanced Scams

In 2025, scams were responsible for an estimated $442 billion in direct losses globally. In the United States, reported losses increased by nearly 400% between 2020 and 2025. Though AI in scamming is a relatively new phenomenon, its use significantly changes the economics of scams as well as the bottlenecks in scam operations. In this paper I investigate what interventions will remain effective under this new AI-driven scamming regime. I develop a simple model of scam profits to understand how different interventions asymptotically affect scam operations. I find that three levers--reporting rate, centralization of reporting, and report accuracy--multiply in their effect on expected victims per scam channel, reducing revenue per scam channel while increasing costs. Because effects multiply, interventions affecting all three could have a significant effect on the profitability of the scam business model. My analysis suggests that even modest reporting rates against high-value scam infrastructure could have significant impacts on scam profitability.

cs.CR↗