arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.03017

(Injective) facet-complexity between simplicial complexes

Cesar A. Ipanaque Zapata·Ayse Borat
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present the notion of facet-complexity, $\text{C}(\mathsf{L};\mathsf{K})$, for two simplicial complexes $\mathsf{L}$ and $\mathsf{K}$, along with basic results for this numerical invariant. This invariant $\text{C}(\mathsf{L};\mathsf{K})$ quantifies the \aspas{complexity} of the following question: When does there exist a facet simplicial map $\mathsf{L}\to \mathsf{K}$? A facet simplicial map is a simplicial map that preserves non-unitary facets. Likewise, we introduce the notion of injective facet-complexity, $\text{IC}(\mathsf{L};\mathsf{K})$. These invariants generalize the notion of (injective) hom-complexity between graphs, recently introduced by Zapata et al. We demonstrate a triangular inequality for (injective) facet-complexity and show that it is a simplicial complex invariant. Additionally, these invariants provide an obstruction to the existence of facet simplicial maps. We explore the sub-additivity of (injective) facet-complexity and we present a lower bound in terms of the chromatic number. Moreover, we provide an upper bound for $\mathrm{C}(\mathsf{L};\mathsf{H})$ in terms of the number of facets of $L$. Finally, we establish a formula for $\mathrm{IC}(\mathsf{L};\mathsf{K})$ when $\mathsf{L}$ is a pure simplicial complex and $K$ is a complete simplicial complex.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cesar A. Ipanaque Zapata, Ayse Borat. 2025-10-03. (Injective) facet-complexity between simplicial complexes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗