Identifying Subgroup and Context Effects in Conjoint Experiments

Abstract

Conjoint experiments have become central to survey research in political science and related fields because they allow researchers to study preferences across multiple attributes simultaneously. Beyond estimating main effects, scholars increasingly analyze heterogeneity through subgroup analysis and contextual variables, raising methodological challenges in detecting and interpreting interaction effects. Statistical power constraints, common in survey experiments, further complicate this task. This paper addresses the question: how can both main and interaction effects be reliably inferred in conjoint studies? We contribute in two ways. First, we conduct a systematic evaluation of leading approaches, including post-hoc corrections, sparse regression methods, and Bayesian models, across simulation regimes that vary sparsity, noise, and data availability. Second, we propose a novel black-box inference framework that leverages machine learning to recover main and interaction effects in conjoint experiments. Our approach balances computational efficiency with accuracy, providing a practical tool for researchers studying heterogeneous effects.