arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2509.20821

Strictly zero-dimensional biframes and Raney extensions

Abstract

Raney extensions and strictly zero-dimensional biframes both faithfully extend the dual of the category of $T_0$ spaces. We use tools from pointfree topology to look at the connection between the two. Raney extensions may be equivalently described as pairs $(L,\mathcal{F})$ where $L$ is a frame and $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \mathcal{S}_{o}(L)$ a subcolocale containing all open sublocales. Here, $\mathcal{S}_o(L)$ is the collection of all intersections of open sublocales of $L$. Similarly, a strictly zero-dimensional biframe is a pair $(L,\mathcal{D})$ where $\mathcal{D}\subseteq \mathcal{S}(L)$ is a codense subcolocale. We show that there is an adjunction between certain subcolocales of $\mathcal{S}_o(L)$ and codense subcolocales of $\mathcal{S}(L)$. We show that the adjunction maximally restricts to an order-isomorphism between the subcolocales of $\mathcal{S}_o(L)$ where the joins of open sublocales distribute over binary meets, which we call the proper subcolocales, and what we call the essential codense subcolocales. As an application of our main result, we establish a bijection between proper Raney extensions and the strictly zero-dimensional biframes $(L_1,L_2,L)$ such that $L$ is an essential extension of $L_2$ in the category of frames. We show that this correspondence cannot be made functorial in the obvious way, as a frame morphism $f:L\to M$ may lift to a map $f:(L,\mathcal{F})\to (L,\mathcal{G})$ of Raney extensions without lifting to a map between the associated strictly zero-dimensional biframes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna Laura Suarez. 2025-09-25. Strictly zero-dimensional biframes and Raney extensions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The circle as a topological fractal

We prove that no family of two continuous self-maps witnesses that the circle is a topological fractal, answering a question of Karasová and the present author. Since three maps are known to suffice, this bound is optimal. In contrast, for every $\varepsilon>0$ there are two continuous self-maps of the circle, depending on $\varepsilon$, whose images cover the circle and an integer $N$ such that every composition of $N$ of them has image of diameter less than $\varepsilon$. Thus two maps suffice at any prescribed scale, but no fixed pair works at all scales.

math.GN

Finite-Point Metrizable Coarsenings: Compatible Gauges, Simplicial Metrics, and Hausdorff Lower Bounds

Let $(X,τ)$ be metrizable and let $F=\{a_1,\ldots,a_k\}\subseteq X$, where $2\le k<\infty$. We represent all metrizable topologies $σ\subseteqτ$ agreeing with $τ$ on $X\setminus F$ by compatible systems of continuous gauges $s_i:X\to[0,1]$ with $s_i^{-1}(0)=\{a_i\}$. The condition $\inf_X\max\{s_i,s_j\}>0$ for $i\ne j$ is equivalent to both Hausdorffness and metrizability of the prescribed gauge topology. A normalized product map into the standard simplex gives an explicit metric; its triangle inequality follows from a simplex slack inequality. This metric is complete whenever the auxiliary bounded compatible metric is complete. For two compatible systems, their coordinatewise minimum describes the intersection topology. It is compatible exactly when the two coarsenings have a common Hausdorff lower bound; in that case the intersection is metrizable and is their meet. Otherwise every common lower topology is non-Hausdorff. A closed-discrete construction produces such an obstructed pair for every noncompact metrizable space and every finite exceptional set with at least two points. Consequently, for these exceptional sets, the family is downward directed, or is a lattice, if and only if $(X,τ)$ is compact, in which case it consists only of $τ$.

math.GN

Journey into special $T_1$-spaces

In this survey, we review certain types of special \(T_{1}\) spaces and their associated fixed-point theorems. Kupka introduced the notion of a feeble topological contraction, which naturally generalizes Lipschitz contractions defined on metric spaces. Specifically, Kupka established a fixed-point theorem for feeble topological contractions possessing a closed graph within the product of arbitrary \(T_{0}\) spaces. Furthermore, the \(T_{1}\) separation axiom is shown to guaranty the uniqueness of such fixed points. Finally, we discuss peripheral Hausdorff and locally Hausdorff spaces within the context of these fixed-point results.

math.GN