arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.18883

Introducing LongCat-Flash-Thinking: A Technical Report

Meituan LongCat Team·Anchun Gui·Bei Li·Bingyang Tao·Bole Zhou·Borun Chen·Chao Zhang·Chengcheng Han·Chenhui Yang·Chi Zhang·Chong Peng·Chuyu Zhang·Cong Chen·Fengcun Li·Gang Xu·Guoyuan Lin·Hao Jiang·Hao Liang·Haomin Fu·Haoxiang Ma·Hong Liu·Hongyan Hao·Hongyin Tang·Hongyu Zang·Hongzhi Ni·Hui Su·Jiahao Liu·Jiahuan Li·Jialin Liu·Jianfei Zhang·Jianhao Xu·Jianing Wang·Jiaqi Sun·Jiaqi Zhang·Jiarong Shi·Jiawei Yang·Jingang Wang·Jinrui Ding·Jun Kuang·Jun Xu·Ke He·Kefeng Zhang·Keheng Wang·Keqing He·Li Wei·Liang Shi·Lin Qiu·Lingbin Kong·Lingchuan Liu·Linsen Guo·Longfei An·Mai Xia·Meng Zhou·Mengshen Zhu·Peng Pei·Pengcheng Jia·Qi Gu·Qi Guo·Qiong Huang·Quan Chen·Quanchi Weng·Rongxiang Weng·Ruichen Shao·Rumei Li·Shanglin Lei·Shuai Du·Shuaikang Liu·Shuang Zhou·Shuhao Hu·Siyu Xu·Songshan Gong·Tao Liang·Tianhao Hu·Wei He·Wei Shi·Wei Wang·Wei Wu·Wei Zhuo·Weifeng Tang·Wenjie Shi·Wenlong Zhu·Xi Su·Xiangcheng Liu·Xiangyu Xi·Xiangzhou Huang·Xiao Liu·Xiaochen Jiang·Xiaowei Shi·Xiaowen Shi·Xiaoyu Li·Xin Chen·Xinyue Zhao·Xuan Huang·Xuemiao Zhang·Xuezhi Cao·Xunliang Cai·Yajie Zhang·Yang Chen·Yang Liu·Yang Zheng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present LongCat-Flash-Thinking, an efficient 560-billion-parameter open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) reasoning model. Its advanced capabilities are cultivated through a meticulously crafted training process, beginning with long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data cold-start and culminating in large-scale Reinforcement Learning (RL). We first employ a well-designed cold-start training strategy, which significantly enhances the reasoning potential and equips the model with specialized skills in both formal and agentic reasoning. Then, a core innovation is our domain-parallel training scheme, which decouples optimization across distinct domains (e.g., STEM, Code, Agentic) and subsequently fuses the resulting expert models into a single, nearly Pareto-optimal model. This entire process is powered by our Dynamic ORchestration for Asynchronous rollout (DORA) system, a large-scale RL framework that delivers a greater than threefold training speedup over synchronous methods on tens of thousands of accelerators. As a result, LongCat-Flash-Thinking achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source models on a suite of complex reasoning tasks. The model exhibits exceptional efficiency in agentic reasoning, reducing average token consumption by 64.5% (from 19, 653 to 6, 965) on AIME-25, without degrading task accuracy. We release LongCat-Flash-Thinking to promote further advances in reasoning systems and agentic AI research.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Meituan LongCat Team, Anchun Gui, Bei Li, Bingyang Tao, Bole Zhou, Borun Chen, Chao Zhang, Chengcheng Han, Chenhui Yang, Chi Zhang, Chong Peng, Chuyu Zhang, Cong Chen, Fengcun Li, Gang Xu, Guoyuan Lin, Hao Jiang, Hao Liang, Haomin Fu, Haoxiang Ma, Hong Liu, Hongyan Hao, Hongyin Tang, Hongyu Zang, Hongzhi Ni, Hui Su, Jiahao Liu, Jiahuan Li, Jialin Liu, Jianfei Zhang, Jianhao Xu, Jianing Wang, Jiaqi Sun, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiarong Shi, Jiawei Yang, Jingang Wang, Jinrui Ding, Jun Kuang, Jun Xu, Ke He, Kefeng Zhang, Keheng Wang, Keqing He, Li Wei, Liang Shi, Lin Qiu, Lingbin Kong, Lingchuan Liu, Linsen Guo, Longfei An, Mai Xia, Meng Zhou, Mengshen Zhu, Peng Pei, Pengcheng Jia, Qi Gu, Qi Guo, Qiong Huang, Quan Chen, Quanchi Weng, Rongxiang Weng, Ruichen Shao, Rumei Li, Shanglin Lei, Shuai Du, Shuaikang Liu, Shuang Zhou, Shuhao Hu, Siyu Xu, Songshan Gong, Tao Liang, Tianhao Hu, Wei He, Wei Shi, Wei Wang, Wei Wu, Wei Zhuo, Weifeng Tang, Wenjie Shi, Wenlong Zhu, Xi Su, Xiangcheng Liu, Xiangyu Xi, Xiangzhou Huang, Xiao Liu, Xiaochen Jiang, Xiaowei Shi, Xiaowen Shi, Xiaoyu Li, Xin Chen, Xinyue Zhao, Xuan Huang, Xuemiao Zhang, Xuezhi Cao, Xunliang Cai, Yajie Zhang, Yang Chen, Yang Liu, Yang Zheng. 2025-09-23. Introducing LongCat-Flash-Thinking: A Technical Report. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18883

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗