arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2509.09493

Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust

Abstract

In distributed systems with asymmetric trust, each participant is free to make its own trust assumptions about others, captured by an asymmetric quorum system. This contrasts with ordinary, symmetric quorum systems and threshold models, where trust assumptions are uniformly shared among participants. Fundamental problems like reliable broadcast and consensus are unsolvable in the asymmetric model if quorum systems satisfy only the classical properties of consistency and availability. Existing approaches overcome this by introducing stronger assumptions. We show that some of these assumptions are overly restrictive, so much so that they effectively eliminate the benefits of asymmetric trust. To address this, we propose a new approach to characterize asymmetric problems and, building upon it, present algorithms for reliable broadcast and consensus that require weaker assumptions than previous solutions. Our methods are general and can be extended to other core problems in systems with asymmetric trust.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ignacio Amores-Sesar, Christian Cachin, Simon Holmgaard Kamp, Juan Villacis. 2026-01-21. Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.opodis.2025.8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Spatio-Temporal Shifting to Reduce Carbon, Water, and Land-Use Footprints of Cloud Workloads

In this paper, we investigate the potential of spatial and temporal cloud workload shifting to reduce carbon, water, and land use footprints. Specifically, we perform a simulation study leveraging publicly available data on the cloud infrastructure of major providers (AWS and Azure) as well as real-world workload traces (big data analytics and FaaS) and grid mix data to consider two different scenarios. Our simulation results indicate that spatial shifting can substantially lower carbon, water, and land use footprints. In the FaaS applications, shifting the spatiotemporal workload achieves carbon savings of up to 85%, water savings of around 50%, and reductions in land use of up to 45%, all while optimizing for the respective factors. Mixed optimization yields results comparable to those of land use alone. For big data workloads, spatiotemporal shifting delivers reductions of up to 45% in carbon emissions, 40% in water consumption, and nearly 40% in land use when optimized for the respective factors. Temporal shifting also decreases the footprint, though to a lesser extent. When applied together, the two strategies yield the greatest overall reduction, driven mainly by spatial shifting with temporal adjustments providing an additional, incremental benefit. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that such shifting is robust to prediction errors in grid mix data and to variations across different seasons.

cs.DC

CodecSight: Leveraging Video Codec Signals for Efficient Streaming VLM Inference

Continuous inference over concurrent video streams imposes substantial compute and memory demands on vision-language model (VLM) serving. Streaming inference uses sliding windows to maintain a bounded context of recent video, but processing each window independently repeats visual encoding and large language model (LLM) prefilling for similar and overlapping content. Existing optimizations provide limited coordination across these stages and often rely on model-specific training, profiling, or model-generated signals. We present CodecSight, a streaming VLM serving system that uses codec metadata as shared runtime guidance across visual encoding and LLM prefilling, without model-specific training or offline profiling. Codec-derived change signals guide patch pruning before visual encoding, reducing both visual computation and the number of downstream visual tokens. Codec-defined frame types guide selective key-value (KV) refresh across windows, while positional correction enables reuse of the remaining cached keys. Across three VLMs and four video workloads, our vLLM-based implementation supports up to $3.3\times$ as many concurrent streams and achieves up to a $5.3\times$ speedup in average time-to-first-token relative to the state-of-the-art baselines. It also reduces executed FLOPs by up to 93%, with a maximum task-quality decrease of 4.64 percentage points.

cs.DC

Evaluating OpenMP Offloading for Intra-node Multi-GPU Programming across NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel Architectures: A 3D Heat Transfer Case Study

Currently, most supercomputers are equipped with GPUs from manufacturers such as NVIDIA, AMD, or Intel, which provide substantial parallelism and high throughput. It is common for a single compute node (intranode) to host multiple GPUs, typically four or more. Therefore, effectively leveraging all these GPUs within a single compute node is essential for applications in scientific and engineering domains. However, several factors must be considered before utilizing these GPUs for scientific computing, including the implementation of data communication, the programming models available for use across these GPUs, and the level of performance that can be achieved with a single codebase across different GPU architectures and configurations within a single compute node. OpenMP Offloading is a prominent directive-based programming model that can be executed on all three GPU types: NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel. In this research, we present an analysis of the benefits and performance challenges of using OpenMP Offloading to address the 3D heat equations, which involve both primary computation, as well as halo computation and communication. For additional comparison and scalability study, we also consider the Conjugate Gradient method. We investigate how performance varies in relation to native GPU programming models-CUDA for NVIDIA, HIP for AMD, and SYCL for Intel. Furthermore, we demonstrate that OpenMP Offloading can achieve performance improvements of approximately 2x for 2 GPUs and around 4x for 4 GPUs when compared to single-GPU OpenMP Offloading implementations across all three GPU types. This analysis is conducted systematically through various OpenMP Offloading implementations that utilize different low-level APIs for memory allocation, memory transfer options (synchronous, asynchronous, and peer-to-peer), and other native GPU programming models such as CUDA(NVIDIA),HIP(AMD),and SYCL(Intel).

cs.DC