arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.07502

Social Media Clones: Exploring the Impact of Social Delegation with AI Clones through a Design Workbook Study

Jackie Liu·Mehrnoosh Sadat Shirvani·Hwajung Hong·Ig-Jae Kim·Dongwook Yoon
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Social media clones are AI-powered social delegates of ourselves created using our personal data. As our identities and online personas intertwine, these technologies have the potential to greatly enhance our social media experience. If mismanaged, however, these clones may also pose new risks to our social reputation and online relationships. To set the foundation for a productive and responsible integration, we set out to understand how social media clones will impact our online behavior and interactions. We conducted a series of semi-structured interviews introducing eight speculative clone concepts to 32 social media users through a design workbook. Applying existing work in AI-mediated communication in the context of social media, we found that although clones can offer convenience and comfort, they can also threaten the user's authenticity and increase skepticism within the online community. As a result, users tend to behave more like their clones to mitigate discrepancies and interaction breakdowns. These findings are discussed through the lens of past literature in identity and impression management to highlight challenges in the adoption of social media clones by the general public, and propose design considerations for their successful integration into social media platforms.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jackie Liu, Mehrnoosh Sadat Shirvani, Hwajung Hong, Ig-Jae Kim, Dongwook Yoon. 2025-09-09. Social Media Clones: Exploring the Impact of Social Delegation with AI Clones through a Design Workbook Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07502

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Apply- Mag: One Tool to Support Many Inclusive Design Methods

Doing inclusive design in HCI practice can be labor-intensive, a costly barrier that some companies and HCI practitioners may be unwilling or unable to overcome. Yet, not doing inclusive design is costly too, in the form of UX barriers that disproportionately disadvantage under-served user populations. To address this problem, we introduce Apply- Mag, an LLM-powered tool to support HCI practitioners' work to design their products inclusively to wide ranges of users. Apply- Mag is general, supporting any inclusive design method that can be expressed as Mags (i.e., using attribute ranges and heuristics). It is also effective: Empirical results with researcher and practitioner teams using various combinations of two Mags on 7 products showed Apply- Mag precision averaging 90-99% and recall averaging 82-89%. Further, its environmental costs were reasonable, costing about the same resources as 2-4 ordinary Google searches.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

A11yLTLNav: Automatic Detection of Accessibility Navigation Failures

For blind and low-vision (BLV) screen-reader users, a website that appears accessible in a static snapshot can become difficult or impossible to navigate once interaction begins. Yet, most automated accessibility checkers miss failures involving focus, interface state, and accessible feedback across interactions. We present A11yLTLNav, a property-based approach for automatically detecting accessibility navigation failures. Through a structured review of prior research, we organize accessibility navigation failures into a failure taxonomy and formalize a browser-observable subset as executable Linear Temporal Logic properties over action-state traces. A11yLTLNav combines random keyboard exploration with runtime property monitoring to detect these failures during interactions. We evaluate A11yLTLNav on 31 generated websites based on real-world websites and tasks. It reported 309 accessibility failures, of which 274 were confirmed, achieving 88.7% precision and identifying more confirmed failures than the comparison checkers. Our results show that A11yLTLNav transforms accessibility knowledge into reusable checks of interface behavior over time.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

AI Peers Exert Social Influence on Human Dishonesty in Groups

Human dishonesty in group settings is highly susceptible to peer influence, particularly when incentivized. Although artificial intelligence (AI) evolves from passive tools into active collaborators, its impact on human moral behavior within groups remains underexplored. We addressed this gap through a two-phase randomized behavioral study (N=280 and N=360). We found AI agents exert substantial social influence comparable in magnitude to that of human peers. Specifically, participants reported more dishonestly when exposed to dishonest rather than honest normative cues. This effect is evident across injunctive, subjective, and descriptive social norms. Interestingly, the only significant adjacent behavioral change occurred when dishonest peer behavior first appeared, whereas further increases from one to four dishonest peers produced weaker and non-monotonic changes. Furthermore, participants rapidly converge on decision-making, showing modest increases in dishonest reporting through repeated exposure. These findings highlight the importance of managing the behaviors and normative signals communicated by AI group members.

cs.HC↗