arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2509.06769

Two-dimensional transducers

Abstract

We define a bicategory $\mathbf{2TDX}$ whose 1-cells provide a categorification of transducers, computational devices extending finite-state automata with output capabilities. This bicategory is a mathematically interesting object: its objects are categories $\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B},\dots$ and its 1-cells $(\mathcal{Q}, t) : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ consist of a category $\mathcal{Q}$ of `states', and a profunctor $$ t : \mathcal{A} \times \mathcal{Q}^\text{op}\times\mathcal{Q} \times (\mathcal{B}^*)^\text{op} \to \mathbf{Set} $$ where $\mathcal{B}^*$ denotes the free monoidal category over $\mathcal{B}$. Extending $t$ to $\mathcal{A}^*$ in a canonical way, to each `word' $\underline a$ in $\mathcal{A}^*$ one attaches an endoprofunctor over the category $\mathcal{Q}$ of states, enriched over presheaves on $\mathcal{B}^*$. We discuss a number of other characterizations of the hom-category $\mathbf{2TDX}(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B})$; we establish a Kleisli-like universal property for $\mathbf{2TDX}(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B})$ and explore the connection of $\mathbf{2TDX}$ to other bicategories of computational models, such as Bob Walters' bicategory of `circuits'; it is convenient to regard $\mathbf{2TDX}$ as the loose bicategory of a double category $\mathbb{D}\mathbf{TDX}$: the bicategory (resp., double category) of profunctors is naturally contained in the bicategory (resp., double category) $\mathbf{2TDX}$ (resp., $\mathbb{D}\mathbf{TDX}$); we study the completeness and cocompleteness properties of $\mathbb{D}\mathbf{TDX}$, the existence of companions and conjoints, and we sketch how monads, adjunctions, and other structures/properties that naturally arise from the definition work in $\mathbb{D}\mathbf{TDX}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fosco Loregian. 2025-09-09. Two-dimensional transducers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06769

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories

For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagger categories and cofree dagger categories via internal dagger category structure. To characterize cofree dagger categories, we use rectangular bands and show that a dagger category is cofree if and only if it is enriched over rectangular bands. For free dagger categories, we define the notion of a zigzag dagger category, and then show that a dagger category is free if and only if it is a zigzag dagger category. We also show that free dagger categories can be characterized as the coalgebras of the induced comonad from the free dagger category adjunction, and similarly that cofree free dagger categories can be characterized as the algebras of the induced monad from the cofree dagger category adjunction.

math.CT

A Counterexample to the Open Question on Object Ideals

We give a counterexample to completeness descent from ideal cotorsion pairs to their objects. A radical-square-zero algebra on the two-cycle gives a finite-dimensional example. The construction is intrinsically non-weakly-idempotent-complete.

math.CT

Grothendieck Topologies Are Extensional Presentations of the Form of Sieves

A Grothendieck topology on a category determines both a subform of covering sieves and a quotient form obtained by identifying locally equivalent sieves. We place these two constructions in a single short exact sequence. For this purpose we introduce distributivity forms: indexed meet-semilattices equipped with distinguished indexed joins over which finite indexed meets distribute, and a strong version in which these joins also satisfy Beck--Chevalley. Over a fixed base, the resulting categories have all small limits and have kernels and cokernels relative to the closed ideal of fibrewise constant-top morphisms. Their monomorphisms are the fibrewise injective morphisms, and their relative cokernels, together with the top-reflecting morphisms, form an orthogonal factorization system. Cokernels compose but need not be stable under pullback, whereas kernels need not compose. We call a short exact sequence with prescribed middle term an extensional presentation, and prove that Grothendieck topologies on a category are precisely the extensional presentations of its maximally distributive form of sieves. Further applications recover universal productive closure operators and Lawvere--Tierney topologies, functorial non-Archimedean group topologies, and functorial linear topologies on commutative rings.

math.CT