arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.06187

The Keychain Problem: On Minimizing the Opportunity Cost of Uncertainty

Ramiro N. Deo-Campo Vuong·Robert Kleinberg·Aditya Prasad·Eric Xiao·Haifeng Xu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a family of sequential decision-making problems, collectively termed the Keychain Problem, that involve exploring a set of actions to maximize expected payoff when only a subset of actions are available in each stage. In an instance of the Keychain Problem, a locksmith faces a sequence of decisions, each of which involves selecting one key from a keychain (a subset of keys) to attempt to open a lock. Given a Bayesian prior on the effectiveness of keys, the locksmith's goal is to minimize the opportunity cost, which is the expected number of rounds in which the chain has a correct key but our selected key is incorrect. We study the computation of the Bayes optimal solution for Keychain Problems. Employing polynomial-time reductions, we establish formal connections between natural variants of the Keychain Problem and well-studied algorithmic economics problems on bipartite graphs. When the keychain order is known to the locksmith, we show that it reduces to Maximum Weight Bipartite Matching (MWBM). More general is the situation when the keychain order is sampled from a prior distribution (possibly correlated with the correct key). Here the Keychain Problem reduces to a novel generalization of MWBM which we coin the Maximum Weight Laminar Matching, which then further reduces to combinatorial auctions under XOS valuation functions. Finally, we show that when the locksmith can choose the keychain order, the Keychain problem reduces from a classic NP-hard combinatorial problem, again, on bipartite graphs. Besides implying algorithmic results and deepening our structural understanding about the Keychain Problem, our established reductions also find applications beyond -- for example, to the Philosopher Inequality for online bipartite matching.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ramiro N. Deo-Campo Vuong, Robert Kleinberg, Aditya Prasad, Eric Xiao, Haifeng Xu. 2025-09-07. The Keychain Problem: On Minimizing the Opportunity Cost of Uncertainty. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06187

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗