arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2508.18868

Tackling estimation risk in Kelly investing using options

Abstract

The Kelly criterion provides a general framework for optimizing the growth rate of an investment portfolio over time by maximizing the expected logarithmic utility of wealth. However, the optimality condition of the Kelly criterion is highly sensitive to accurate estimates of the probabilities and investment payoffs. Estimation risk can lead to greatly suboptimal portfolios. In a simple binomial model, we show that the introduction of a European option in the Kelly framework can be used to construct a class of growth optimal portfolios that are robust to estimation risk.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fabrizio Lillo, Piero Mazzarisi, Ioanna-Yvonni Tsaknaki. 2025-11-03. Tackling estimation risk in Kelly investing using options. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18868

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Capital Asset Pricing Model with Size Factor and Normalizing by Volatility Index

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) relates a well-diversified stock portfolio to a benchmark portfolio, usually taken to be the S\&P 500. We insert size effect in the CAPM, capturing a real-life feature that on average, small stocks (measured by market capitalization) have higher risk and return than large stocks. Testing CAPM involves fitting linear regressions. Our goal is to ensure that regression residuals are independent identically distributed Gaussian. In some cases, we find that including the Volatility Index as a multiplicative factor by these residuals makes them closer to that ideal. In this article, we combine these ideas to create a new discrete-time model, which includes volatility, size factor, and the CAPM. We fit this model using real-world data, prove the long-term stability of this model, and analyze the resulting capital distribution curves.

q-fin.MF

Arbitrage on Decentralized Exchanges

Decentralized exchanges using automated market makers create arbitrage opportunities with centralized exchanges, where gas fees and transaction ordering are critical. Existing models largely overlook competition among arbitrageurs, despite price discrepancies being public information. We develop the first equilibrium model of gas fee competition between two arbitrageurs under three transaction reversion settings: no-revert, auto-revert, and selectable-revert. We show that pure symmetric equilibria do not exist, but unique mixed equilibria can be characterized. Using data from Binance and Uniswap V2, we empirically confirm that arbitrageurs face positive inventory risk and validate our model's implications: gas fees increase with price discrepancies and liquidity, while trading amounts rise with both price discrepancies and gas fees. Comparative analysis reveals that under low inventory risk, the no-revert setting favors arbitrageurs in terms of profit, while auto-revert and selectable-revert settings enhance market efficiency. Under high inventory risk, the no-revert and selectable-revert settings dominate the auto-revert setting in both profitability and efficiency.

q-fin.MF

Meyer risk measures

Risk measures summarize the risk profile of financial positions in a single metric, which allows their comparison and supports investment decisions. When they respect common stochastic orders such as second-order stochastic dominance (SSD), they rest on sound conceptual grounds. Since SSD can be overly conservative and rigid, we study Meyer risk measures. Those are monetary risk measures that are consistent with stochastic orders induced by a threshold utility function $v$, where the defining test utilities are at least as risk averse as $v$. The flexibility in choosing $v$ allows to encompass a wide range of stochastic orders, including SSD. Our contribution is threefold. First, we show that Meyer risk measures whose threshold utility $v$ is CARA admit a lower envelope representation via adjusted risk measures, and analyse how they extend and compare to classical risk measures. Second, we show that monotone additive statistics, recently introduced in decision theory, are Meyer risk measures under mild conditions. Third, impossibility results for the situation beyond the CARA class establish that monetary risk measures compatible to the associated stochastic orders either fail to exist or cannot satisfy key properties simultaneously. Throughout, we highlight practical implications, for example to portfolio selection and risk management.

q-fin.MF