arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.14820

The Rectilinear Marco Polo Problem

Ofek Gila·Michael T. Goodrich·Zahra Hadizadeh·Daniel S. Hirschberg·Shayan Taherijam
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the rectilinear Marco Polo problem, which generalizes the Euclidean version of the Marco Polo problem for performing geometric localization to rectilinear search environments, such as in geometries motivated from urban settings, and to higher dimensions. In the rectilinear Marco Polo problem, there is at least one point of interest (POI) within distance $n$, in either the $L_1$ or $L_\infty$ metric, from the origin. Motivated from a search-and-rescue application, our goal is to move a search point, $\Delta$, from the origin to a location within distance $1$ of a POI. We periodically issue probes from $\Delta$ out a given distance (in either the $L_1$ or $L_\infty$ metric) and if a POI is within the specified distance of $\Delta$, then we learn this (but no other location information). Optimization goals are to minimize the number of probes and the distance traveled by $\Delta$. We describe a number of efficient search strategies for rectilinear Marco Polo problems and we analyze each one in terms of the size, $n$, of the search domain, as defined by the maximum distance to a POI.

Explore related subjects

cs.CG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ofek Gila, Michael T. Goodrich, Zahra Hadizadeh, Daniel S. Hirschberg, Shayan Taherijam. 2025-08-20. The Rectilinear Marco Polo Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14820

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗