arXiv · 2508.14273
Towards AI-Assisted Research Writing: Benchmarking LLMs for AI/ML Introduction Generation
Abstract
As researchers increasingly adopt LLMs as writing assistants, generating high-quality research paper introductions remains both challenging and essential. We introduce Scientific Introduction Generation (SciIG), a task that evaluates LLMs' ability to produce coherent introductions from titles, abstracts, and related works. Curating new datasets from NAACL 2025 and ICLR 2025 papers, we assess five state-of-the-art models, including both open-source (DeepSeek-v3, Gemma-3-12B, LLaMA 4-Maverick, MistralAI Small 3.1) and closed-source GPT-4o systems, across multiple dimensions: lexical overlap, semantic similarity, content coverage, faithfulness, consistency, citation correctness, and narrative quality. Our comprehensive framework combines automated metrics with LLM-as-a-judge evaluations. Results demonstrate LLaMA-4 Maverick's superior performance on most metrics, particularly in semantic similarity and faithfulness. Moreover, three-shot prompting consistently outperforms fewer-shot approaches. These findings provide practical insights into developing effective research writing assistants and set realistic expectations for LLM-assisted academic writing. To foster re- producibility and future research, we publicly release all code and datasets.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Krishna Garg, Firoz Shaik, Sambaran Bandyopadhyay, Cornelia Caragea. 2026-08-31. Towards AI-Assisted Research Writing: Benchmarking LLMs for AI/ML Introduction Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14273
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.