arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2508.11780

Multivariate Planar Curves: A Statistical Framework for Shape Analysis in Images

Abstract

Recent developments in computer vision have made segmented images widely available across many domains, such as medicine, where segmented radiographs play an important role in diagnosis. As prediction problems are common in image analysis, this work explores the use of the object contours highlighted by such images as predictors in a supervised classification context. To this end, we develop a new statistical learning framework that accounts for the joint shape of the multiple objects contained in an image. We introduce a formalism that extends the study of a single random planar curve to the joint analysis of several planar curves, referred to as a multivariate planar curve. Modeling the contours jointly, rather than separately, preserves the inter-component information, such as their relative position, scale, and orientation, which is often essential to the analysis. Based on this model, we propose a joint alignment procedure and we extend core inferential tools to multivariate shapes: shape dissimilarity, Fr\'echet mean estimation, and tangent-space representation. These tangent coordinates are then used as predictors in standard functional classification models. A simulation study shows accurate recovery of deformation parameters over increasing noise levels. Then, through a cardiomegaly detection problem on segmented chest X-rays, we show that jointly modeling the contours is robust to misalignment and improves classification accuracy over both a contour-wise univariate analysis and a naive approach based on the raw curves.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Issam-Ali Moindjié, Cédric Beaulac, Marie-Hélène Descary. 2025-08-15. Multivariate Planar Curves: A Statistical Framework for Shape Analysis in Images. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11780

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME