arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.11131

Estimating Effects of Longitudinal Modified Treatment Policies (LMTPs) on Rates of Change in Health Outcomes

Anja Shahu·Weijie Xia·Ying Wei·Daniel Malinsky
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Longitudinal data often contains outcomes measured at multiple visits, and scientific interest may lie in quantifying the effect of an intervention on an outcome's rate of change. For example, one may wish to study the progression (or trajectory) of a disease over time under different hypothetical interventions. We extend the longitudinal modified treatment policy (LMTP) methodology to estimate effects of complex, exposure-dependent interventions on rates of change in an outcome over time. We exploit the theoretical properties of a nonparametric efficient influence function (EIF)-based estimator to introduce a novel inference framework that can be used to construct simultaneous confidence intervals for a variety of causal effects of interest and to formally test relevant global and local hypotheses about rates of change. We demonstrate the utility of our framework in investigating whether a longitudinal shift intervention affects an outcome's counterfactual trajectory, as compared with no intervention. We present results from a simulation study to illustrate the performance of our inference framework in a longitudinal setting with time-varying confounding and a continuous exposure. We also apply our inference framework to the Columbia Brain Health DataBank (CBDB) to examine the effect of shifting blood pressure on the progression of dementia.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anja Shahu, Weijie Xia, Ying Wei, Daniel Malinsky. 2026-05-29. Estimating Effects of Longitudinal Modified Treatment Policies (LMTPs) on Rates of Change in Health Outcomes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A robust, scalable K-statistic for quantifying immune cell clustering in spatial proteomics data

Spatial summary statistics based on point process theory are widely used to quantify the spatial organization of cell populations in single-cell spatial proteomics data. Among these, Ripley's K is a popular metric for assessing whether cells are spatially clustered or are randomly dispersed. However, the key assumption of spatial homogeneity is frequently violated in spatial proteomics data, leading to overestimates of cell clustering and colocalization. To address this, we propose a novel method, termed KAMP (K adjustment by Analytical Moments of the Permutation distribution), for quantifying the spatial organization of cells in spatial proteomics samples. KAMP leverages background cells in each sample along with a new closed-form representation of the first and second moments of the permutation null distribution of Ripley's K. Our method is robust to inhomogeneity, computationally efficient even in large datasets, and provides approximate p-values to test spatial clustering and colocalization. Methodological developments are motivated by a spatial proteomics study of women with ovarian cancer; in the subset with sufficient B cells and macrophages, KAMP provides exploratory, scale-specific evidence linking B cell-macrophage colocalization with overall patient survival. Notably, we also find evidence that using K without correcting for sample inhomogeneity may bias hazard ratio estimates in downstream analyses.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A Heavily Right Strategy for Statistical Inference with Dependent Studies in Arbitrary Dimensions

We leverage recent advances in heavy-tail approximations for global hypothesis testing with dependent studies to construct approximate confidence regions without modeling or estimating their dependence structures. A non-rejection region is a confidence region but it may not be convex. Convexity is appealing because it ensures any one-dimensional linear projection of the region is a confidence interval, easy to compute and interpret. We show why convexity fails for nearly all heavy-tail combination tests proposed in recent years, including the influential Cauchy combination test. These insights motivate a heavily right strategy: truncating the left half of the Cauchy distribution to obtain the Half-Cauchy combination test. The harmonic mean test also corresponds to a heavily right distribution with a Cauchy-like tail, namely a Pareto distribution with unit power. We prove that both approaches guarantee convexity when individual studies are summarized by Hotelling $T^2$ or $χ^{2}$ statistics (regardless of the validity of this summary) and provide efficient, exact algorithms for implementation. Applying these methods, we develop a divide-and-combine strategy for mean estimation in any dimension and construct simultaneous confidence intervals in a network meta-analysis for treatment effect comparisons across multiple clinical trials. We also present many open problems and conclude with epistemic reflections.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Recent advances in the Bradley--Terry Model: theory, algorithms, and applications

This article surveys recent advances in the Bradley-Terry (BT) model and its extensions. We focus on statistical and computational aspects, with particular emphasis on the regime in which both the number of objects and the volume of comparisons tend to infinity-a setting relevant to large-scale applications. The main topics include asymptotic theory for statistical estimation and inference, together with the corresponding computational algorithms. We also review applications of these models in sports analytics, social choice, psychometrics, and machine learning. Finally, we discuss several key challenges and outline directions for future research.

stat.ME↗