arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2508.06791

Entendimento de Campanhas no Contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde: Um Processo de Design Socialmente Consciente

Abstract

This report presents the results of an exploratory analysis of the work context of Community Health Agents and Endemic Disease Control Agents in Primary Health Care (PHC), with a particular focus on Health Campaigns. To understand this context, the study adopted the Socially Aware Design framework, which employs artifacts and techniques to examine problem domains in a comprehensive and sociotechnical manner. Methods such as the Stakeholder Identification Diagram, Evaluation Frame, and Semiotic Framework were applied to identify stakeholders, anticipate challenges, and elicit social and technical requirements for the solution. Personas and Scenarios were also used to illustrate the potential impacts of a solution on various stakeholders and their life contexts within health campaigns. This report presents the analysis method, its application, and results, discussing the study's findings to inform the development of medium-fidelity prototypes for a PHC health campaign management solution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Deógenes P. da Silva Junior, Jonas Lopes Guerra, Krissia Menezes, Marisa Sel Franco, Roberto Pereira. 2025-08-09. Entendimento de Campanhas no Contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde: Um Processo de Design Socialmente Consciente. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06791

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Apply- Mag: One Tool to Support Many Inclusive Design Methods

Doing inclusive design in HCI practice can be labor-intensive, a costly barrier that some companies and HCI practitioners may be unwilling or unable to overcome. Yet, not doing inclusive design is costly too, in the form of UX barriers that disproportionately disadvantage under-served user populations. To address this problem, we introduce Apply- Mag, an LLM-powered tool to support HCI practitioners' work to design their products inclusively to wide ranges of users. Apply- Mag is general, supporting any inclusive design method that can be expressed as Mags (i.e., using attribute ranges and heuristics). It is also effective: Empirical results with researcher and practitioner teams using various combinations of two Mags on 7 products showed Apply- Mag precision averaging 90-99% and recall averaging 82-89%. Further, its environmental costs were reasonable, costing about the same resources as 2-4 ordinary Google searches.

cs.HC

A11yLTLNav: Automatic Detection of Accessibility Navigation Failures

For blind and low-vision (BLV) screen-reader users, a website that appears accessible in a static snapshot can become difficult or impossible to navigate once interaction begins. Yet, most automated accessibility checkers miss failures involving focus, interface state, and accessible feedback across interactions. We present A11yLTLNav, a property-based approach for automatically detecting accessibility navigation failures. Through a structured review of prior research, we organize accessibility navigation failures into a failure taxonomy and formalize a browser-observable subset as executable Linear Temporal Logic properties over action-state traces. A11yLTLNav combines random keyboard exploration with runtime property monitoring to detect these failures during interactions. We evaluate A11yLTLNav on 31 generated websites based on real-world websites and tasks. It reported 309 accessibility failures, of which 274 were confirmed, achieving 88.7% precision and identifying more confirmed failures than the comparison checkers. Our results show that A11yLTLNav transforms accessibility knowledge into reusable checks of interface behavior over time.

cs.HC

AI Peers Exert Social Influence on Human Dishonesty in Groups

Human dishonesty in group settings is highly susceptible to peer influence, particularly when incentivized. Although artificial intelligence (AI) evolves from passive tools into active collaborators, its impact on human moral behavior within groups remains underexplored. We addressed this gap through a two-phase randomized behavioral study (N=280 and N=360). We found AI agents exert substantial social influence comparable in magnitude to that of human peers. Specifically, participants reported more dishonestly when exposed to dishonest rather than honest normative cues. This effect is evident across injunctive, subjective, and descriptive social norms. Interestingly, the only significant adjacent behavioral change occurred when dishonest peer behavior first appeared, whereas further increases from one to four dishonest peers produced weaker and non-monotonic changes. Furthermore, participants rapidly converge on decision-making, showing modest increases in dishonest reporting through repeated exposure. These findings highlight the importance of managing the behaviors and normative signals communicated by AI group members.

cs.HC