arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2508.06773

Methodology for Business Intelligence Solutions in Internet Banking Companies

Abstract

Business intelligence in the banking industry has been studied extensively in the last decade; however, business executives still do not perceive efficiency in the decision-making process since the management and treatment of information are very timeconsuming for the deliverer, generating costs in the process. On the other hand, there is no formal methodology for developing business intelligence solutions in this sector. This work aims to optimize decision-making in a business unit that works with internet banking companies, reducing the time, the number of people, and the costs involved in decision-making. To meet the objective, basic and applied research was conducted. The basic research allowed the construction of a new methodology from a study of critical success factors and approaches from the business intelligence literature. The applied research involved the implementation of a business intelligence solution applying the new methodology in a pre-experimental study. Thirty decision-making processes were analyzed using pre-test and post-test data. Tools such as a stopwatch and observation were used to collect and record data on time spent, the number of people, and the decision-making costs. This information was processed in the specialized Minitab18 statistical software, which allowed the observation and confirmation of relevant results regarding time reduction, the number of people, and the costs generated. Therefore, it was concluded that the business intelligence solution, applying the new methodology, optimized decision making in the business unit that works with internet banking for companies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alex Escalante Viteri, Javier Gamboa Cruzado, Leonidas Asto Huaman. 2025-08-09. Methodology for Business Intelligence Solutions in Internet Banking Companies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06773

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Optimized but Unowned: How AI-Authored Goals Undermine the Motivation They Are Meant to Drive

As AI tools become embedded in productivity and self-improvement contexts, a pressing question emerges: what happens when AI does the goal-setting for us? In a preregistered experiment (N = 470), we compared self-authored goals against LLM-authored goals derived from a personal reflection. LLM-generated goals scored higher on SMART criteria (|d| = 2.26), yet participants in the LLM condition reported lower psychological ownership (|d| = 1.38), commitment (|d| = 1.19), and perceived importance (|d| = 1.13). At two-week follow-up, 72.8% of self-authored participants had acted on two or more of their goals, compared to 46.6% in the LLM condition. Psychological ownership, not goal quality, mediated every downstream motivational outcome. Individuals low in trait self-efficacy, those most likely to seek AI assistance, experienced the steepest ownership erosion. These findings reveal a quality-motivation dissociation in AI-assisted goal-setting and identify authorship preservation as a design priority for AI tools deployed in identity-relevant, behavior-dependent tasks.

cs.HC

Creating an Atomic User Model for Personality-Aware Large Language Model Interaction

Assistants built on large language models are expected to write in their users' own voice. Most systems summarise the user's preferences and include the summary in the prompt. This is the wrong way round. Preferences are only the surface of a person and change with the task, while the underlying personality stays the same, so storing preferences alone means relearning the user afresh whenever the task changes. This paper makes four contributions. First, we describe an effect we call personality seepage: the wording of a prompt carries traces of the writer's personality, which the assistant copies without knowing the writer. Second, we propose the Atomic User Model (AUM), a readable profile with a stable identity core surrounded by four layers covering psychological, cognitive, experiential, behavioral, and social details, plus notes on inner conflict and authenticity. Third, instead of inserting the entire profile, we use AUM as a searchable index, in which a task classifier, a selection step, and a budgeted retriever pass along only a few relevant fields. Fourth, we test the pipeline with 16 simulated users, 6 style-sensitive tasks, and 3 seeds. Eight retrieved fields matched the writing quality of the whole profile, while using only 23 percent of the context (211 tokens instead of 915). They scored 0.24 points higher than a plain preference note on a five-point scale. Accuracy in picking a user's own writing from four samples rose from 14.9 to 42.7 percent, where guessing gives 25 percent. Four pre-registered controls showed no effect, so the gain comes from the profile's structure rather than the search method. Personalization helps most for the users for whom a generic assistant imitates them the worst.

cs.HC

When AI Becomes Hard to Understand: Cognitive Demands in Real-World Human-AI Conversations

Generative AI increasingly supports complex financial and health decisions, yet we know little about when its responses become difficult to process in real-world dialogue. We analyse more than 84,000 ChatGPT and Gemini conversations, using repeated prompting and clarification following misunderstanding as behavioural indicators of cognitive difficulty. We find that response characteristics such as length, readability and lexical diversity do not have fixed relationships with conversational difficulty; instead, their relationships depend on how they combine. Most notably, greater lexical diversity was associated with less repeated prompting in shorter responses, but this association weakened as response length increased, a pattern that replicated across financial and health conversations. We propose a conversational complexity budget to conceptualise these interdependencies: the demands associated with one response characteristic may depend on those accompanying it. The resulting design challenge is how to configure response complexity for the particular user, task and interaction.

cs.HC