arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2508.01360

Trade Policy and Structural Change

Abstract

We study how tariffs affect industrial structure and welfare in an economy where sectors are complements and preferences are nonhomothetic---two drivers of structural change. Tariffs reshape sectoral composition through relative prices, income effects, and sectoral net exports. We characterize these mechanisms analytically and quantify them in a dynamic multi-country model with capital accumulation and input-output linkages. A counterfactual 20-percentage-point increase in U.S. manufacturing tariffs raises the manufacturing value-added share by about one percentage point and increases U.S. welfare by 0.43 percent, while lowering welfare abroad; retaliation would make all countries worse off. The optimal unilateral U.S. manufacturing tariff is 20.9 percent. Comparing different preference specifications, we show that homothetic preferences without income effects overstate the U.S. welfare gains from unilateral tariff increases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hayato Kato, Kensuke Suzuki, Motoaki Takahashi. 2026-08-03. Trade Policy and Structural Change. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01360

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN