arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2508.00579

MHier-RAG: Multi-Modal RAG for Visual-Rich Document Question-Answering via Hierarchical and Multi-Granularity Reasoning

Abstract

The multi-modal long-context document question-answering task aims to locate and integrate multi-modal evidences (such as texts, tables, charts, images, and layouts) distributed across multiple pages, for question understanding and answer generation. The existing methods can be categorized into Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM)-based and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based methods. However, the former were susceptible to hallucinations, while the latter struggled for inter-modal disconnection and cross-page fragmentation. To address these challenges, a novel multi-modal RAG model, named MHier-RAG, was proposed, leveraging both textual and visual information across long-range pages to facilitate accurate question answering for visual-rich documents. A hierarchical indexing method with the integration of flattened in-page chunks and topological cross-page chunks was designed to jointly establish in-page multi-modal associations and long-distance cross-page dependencies. By means of joint similarity evaluation and large language model (LLM)-based re-ranking, a multi-granularity semantic retrieval method, including the page-level parent page retrieval and document-level summary retrieval, was proposed to foster multi-modal evidence connection and long-distance evidence integration and reasoning. Experimental results performed on public datasets, MMLongBench-Doc and LongDocURL, demonstrated the superiority of our MHier-RAG method in understanding and answering modality-rich and multi-page documents.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ziyu Gong, Chengcheng Mai, Yihua Huang. 2025-10-02. MHier-RAG: Multi-Modal RAG for Visual-Rich Document Question-Answering via Hierarchical and Multi-Granularity Reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00579

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Trigger Timing, Deadline Readiness, and Event-Aligned Accounting for Dynamic Ad Insertion

Dynamic ad insertion comparisons can conflate trigger, reach, readiness, playback, billability and measurement even when the accounting is arithmetically correct. We separate these events with an observed-event ledger, a candidate-invariant reference deadline and pod-level contribution accounting. The deadline rule is fixed before candidate assignment and tests whether an admissible transition state remains valid, not whether preparation merely finished earlier. A restricted monotone-playback representation states when media-position summaries suffice; a counterexample shows why they fail over a wider path class. An offline synthetic study exercises the definitions over nine short-lifetime conditions informative for the readiness comparison and nine long-lifetime conditions serving as analytic controls. Across 45,000 shared scripts, two trigger policies share imposed playback paths, latency draws and hypothetical value and cost coefficients. Playhead summaries substantially misclassify reach events in the nonmonotone mixtures, yet neither shortcut reverses the contribution contrast in this grid, because some errors cancel under the shared design. Replacing validity at the deadline with completion by the deadline reverses the comparison in three of the nine informative conditions, all at one of the three latency settings. Scoring readiness at actual viewer arrival rather than at the reference deadline shifts pause-path readiness but changes no contribution sign. These outcomes are consequences of the event definitions applied to established misclassification mechanisms. Conservative bounds retain uncertainty when records are missing, and the artifact records code, seeds, event histories and checking procedures. The evidence is synthetic, uses no commercial telemetry, and ranks neither server-side nor server-guided insertion.

cs.MM

SemABR: Measuring Video Semantic Fidelity with Multimodal LLMs for Adaptive Bitrate Streaming

Conventional video metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF measure visual distortion or perceptual quality, but they do not directly capture semantic preservation: whether compression retains a video's objects, actions, and temporal narrative. Existing Quality-of-Experience (QoE)-driven bitrate-selection and resource-allocation methods primarily aim to minimize rebuffering and bitrate switching while maximizing perceptual video quality, without explicitly considering semantic preservation. To address this gap, we introduce video semantic fidelity (SF), a metric that quantifies how well a compressed video preserves the semantic content of its source. An offline multimodal large language model (MLLM) generates structured descriptions of the reference and compressed versions of the video, and a separate text-only large language model (LLM) evaluates their semantic correspondence. The resulting content-dependent SF--bitrate profiles are cached and queried by the online bitrate selector without invoking MLLMs at runtime. Evaluations on three subjective QoE benchmarks show a consistent positive association between SF and mean opinion scores (MOS). A separate human semantic-rating study evaluates semantic preservation and shows that SF correlates more strongly with human judgments than conventional video metrics. We then embed these profiles into a 5G MEC-assisted video-on-demand (VoD) resource-allocation framework at the base station. When wireless resources cannot support high bitrate levels for all users, the framework uses the SF--bitrate profiles to select bitrate levels jointly across users and reduce the semantic loss caused by the required bitrate reductions. NS-3 simulations with the 5G NR module show that the proposed framework achieves higher average and worst-user SF than the evaluated baselines, with a widening advantage as the wireless resources available to each user decrease.

cs.MM

Multimodal Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis Based on Gated Noise Filtering and Emotion-Relevance Interaction

Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (MABSA) infers fine-grained sentiment polarity toward specific aspects by jointly modeling text and images. Despite progress in cross-modal fusion, two challenges remain in multi-aspect settings: (1) multimodal noise, where aspect-irrelevant content distracts sentiment learning; and (2) weak cross-modal sentiment alignment, as visual evidence can be ambiguous and textual--visual sentiments may conflict, limiting multimodal complementarity. To address these issues, we propose a Gated Noise-filtered Sentiment-Relevance Interaction (GNSRI) framework. It employs a gated noise-filtering module to suppress sentiment-irrelevant features and enhance aspect-aware sentiment cues, and a sentiment-relevance interaction module to capture consistent and conflicting cross-modal signals at micro and macro levels. Finally, a learnable decision fusion mechanism adaptively combines predictions from textual, visual, and cross-modal branches at the aspect level. Experiments on public MABSA benchmarks show that GNSRI outperforms state-of-the-art methods, improving accuracy by 1.94\% and 2.06\% on Twitter-2015 and Twitter-2017, respectively.

cs.MM