arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.20037

Comparing the face rings of a boolean complex and its barycentric subdivision

Ben Blum-Smith·Sophie Marques
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the relationship between the Stanley--Reisner ring (a.k.a. face ring) of a simplicial or boolean complex $Δ$ and that of its barycentric subdivision. These rings share a distinguished parameter subring. S. Murai asked if they are isomorphic, equivariantly with respect to the automorphism group $\operatorname{Aut}(Δ)$, as modules over this parameter subring. We show that, in general, the answer is no, but for Cohen--Macaulay complexes in characteristic coprime to $|\operatorname{Aut}(Δ)|$, it is yes, and we give an explicit construction of an isomorphism. To give this construction, we adapt a pair of tools introduced by A. Garsia in 1980. The first one transfers bases from a Stanley--Reisner ring to closely related rings of which it is a Gröbner degeneration, and the second identifies bases to transfer.

Explore related subjects

math.ACmath.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ben Blum-Smith, Sophie Marques. 2026-08-06. Comparing the face rings of a boolean complex and its barycentric subdivision. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On triviality of $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action

T. Kambayashi had shown that $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over separable field extensions are necessarily polynomial rings. However, there exist inseparable $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms which are not necessarily polynomial rings. In this paper, we give a structure theorem for $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over arbitrary field extensions admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action. From this structure theorem we derive some conditions under which an $\mathbb{A}^2$-form becomes trivial. In particular, we prove that over a field $k$, a factorial $\mathbb{A}^2$-form having a $k$-rational point and a non-trivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action is trivial and we also give examples demonstrating that none of these hypotheses can be discarded. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we obtain a generalization of the Zariski Cancellation Theorem for the affine plane over an arbitrary field.

math.AC↗
arXiv2026

Symbolic powers of the ideal of$n$ general points in $P^{n-1}$

Problem L of Fröberg--Lundqvist--Oneto--Shapiro asks for the difference between the Hilbert series of ordinary and symbolic powers of the ideal of general points in projective space. We solve this completely for \(n\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\). Besides a closed formula for \[ \HS(S/I^m)-\HS(S/I^{(m)}), \] we determine all minimal monomial generators of \(I^{(m)}\), and describe the symbolic Rees algebra. We also show that containment \(I^{(m)}\subseteq I^r\) is detected solely by initial degrees. This gives the exact containment threshold, the Waldschmidt constant \(\walpha\), the resurgence \(\Res\), and the asymptotic resurgence \(\aRes\): \[ \walpha(I)=\frac{n}{n-1}, \qquad \Res(I)=\aRes(I)=\frac{2(n-1)}{n}. \] We also take the first step beyond \(n\) points: for \(n+1\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\) --- again a rigid, non-monomial configuration --- we identify the defining quadrics, resolve the case \(n=3\) completely (a complete intersection, with \(J^{(m)}=J^m\) for all \(m\) and resurgence \(1\)), and propose an exact Waldschmidt-constant formula \(\walpha=\frac{n+1}{n-1}\) for all \(n\), verified computationally in every case we could check.

math.AC↗