arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2507.19951

PDLogger: Automated Logging Framework for Practical Software Development

Abstract

Logging is indispensable for maintaining the reliability and diagnosability of modern software, yet developers still struggle to decide where and how to log effectively. Existing automated logging techniques focus on isolated sub-tasks - predicting a single log position, level, or message - and therefore cannot produce complete, high-quality log statements that reflect real-world practice in which multiple logs often appear inside one method. They also neglect deeper semantic dependencies among methods and consider only a narrow set of candidate variables, leading to superficial or incomplete logs. In this paper, we present PDLogger, the first end-to-end log generation technique expressly designed for practical, multi-log scenarios. PDLogger operates in three phases. (1) Log position prediction: block-type-aware structured prompts guide a large language model (LLM) to suggest candidate positions across all control-flow blocks of a method. (2) Log generation: backward program slicing supplies precise inter-procedural control and data-dependency context, while an expanded variable extractor captures both member and external function expressions; the enriched prompt enables the LLM to emit a full log statement (position, level, message, variables). (3) Log refinement: level correction and context-sensitive deduplication prune false positives and redundant logs. We evaluate PDLogger on 3,113 log statements drawn from two widely used Java projects. Compared with the strongest prior systems, PDLogger improves log-position precision by 139.0 percent, F1 by 69.2 percent, level accuracy by 82.3 percent, variable precision by 131.8 percent, and message quality (BERTScore) by 65.7 percent. The framework consistently performs well with different mainstream LLMs, demonstrating robustness and generality. PDLogger's implementation is available as open source to foster future research and adoption.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shengcheng Duan, Yihua Xu, Sheng Zhang, Shen Wang, Yue Duan. 2025-07-26. PDLogger: Automated Logging Framework for Practical Software Development. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19951

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks

Vibe coding is a new software development paradigm in which human engineers prompt a large language model (LLM) agent to complete complex coding tasks with little supervision. Although vibe coding is increasingly adopted, is the generated code really safe to deploy in production? To investigate this question, we propose SUSVIBES, a benchmark consisting of 186 feature-request software engineering tasks from real-world open-source projects, for which, human programmers committed vulnerable implementations. We evaluate 12 widely used coding agentic settings with frontier models on the benchmark. Disturbingly, all agents perform poorly in terms of software security. Although 57% of the solutions from SWE-Agent with Claude 4 Sonnet are functionally correct, only 11.8% are secure. Further experiments demonstrate that preliminary security strategies, such as augmenting the feature request with vulnerability hints, cannot mitigate these security issues. Our findings raise serious concerns about the widespread adoption of vibe coding, particularly in security-sensitive applications. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/LeiLiLab/susvibes. The leaderboard is at https://leililab.github.io/susvibes-leaderboard.

cs.SE

Why3-py: A Tool for Formal Verification of Hypothesis Testing and Meta-Analysis in Python

The reproducibility crisis in scientific research has received widespread recognition, thereby increasing the importance of meta-analyses that integrate statistical analyses from multiple studies. However, statistical methods often have ambiguous and implicit underlying assumptions, which can lead to their erroneous applications and interpretations. To address this issue, we propose a formal verification framework for statistical Python programs. Specifically, we present Why3-py, a Python front-end for the Why3 verification platform that transforms Python code into verification-oriented WhyML representations, addressing the challenges arising from Python's dynamic typing and runtime polymorphism. Furthermore, we extend the StatWhy tool to support the verification of meta-analysis methods. These tools enable meta-analysts to identify overlooked assumptions and misuse of analyses, and to verify the correct use of hypothesis testing and meta-analysis methods in Python code.

cs.SE

What is the Difference Between Me and You? Benchmarking the Quality Gap Between Human-Written and AI-Generated Code

AI coding assistants are becoming co-authors of production software, yet their evaluation centers on functional correctness, leaving open whether their code differs from human code in the quality dimensions dominating lifecycle cost. We compare human-written and AI-generated code at scale: 787,562 function pairs across Python, Java, and C, each human function mined from open-source repositories paired with implementations generated from its docstring by three AI assistants (OpenAI GPT models, DeepSeek-Coder, Qwen2.5-Coder). We characterize structural complexity and statistical naturalness, and map static-analysis findings onto Orthogonal Defect Classification for defects and the Common Weakness Enumeration for vulnerabilities, making authors and languages directly comparable. AI-generated code is structurally compressed and stylistically templated: roughly half the size and branching of human code, clustering apart at the style level. Defect profiles differ in kind: human code concentrates issues of mature codebases, AI code repetitive boilerplate; security is language-dependent, with LLMs producing more, and more severe, findings in Python and Java but fewer high-severity memory-safety findings than humans in C. Once size is controlled for, complexity metrics carry little signal, while naturalness separates authors. Finally, we release CQBench, a benchmark of 27,346 issue-prone tasks with baselines and an evaluation pipeline for quality assurance and security testing.

cs.SE