arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.19314

The Morpho-Kinetic Landscape of Macrophage Modes During Wound Healing in Zebrafish

Seol Ah Park·Giulia Lupi·Resul Ozbilgic·Michal Kollar·Aneta A. Ozvat·Mai Nguyen-Chi·Karol Mikula
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Macrophages play an essential role in wound healing due to their dynamic nature and functional plasticity, exhibiting highly heterogeneous morpho-kinetic behaviors depending on their activation states. However, quantitative analysis of macrophage behavior in in vivo settings remains limited, largely due to the complexity of their diverse morphologies and motility patterns over time. In this study, we present an analytic workflow to investigate macrophage dynamics in zebrafish. By computing a comprehensive set of morpho-kinetic features, we observe that M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory) macrophages exhibit distinct behaviors, such as reduced shape elongation, more directed movement, and less random-like motion in M1 compared to M2 macrophages. Based on these features, we classify macrophages in the transition period into M1-like and M2-like groups. We compare and analyze their behaviors, which allows us to estimate the timing of the phenotypic switch. In addition, macrophages not expressing Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) are located significantly farther from the wound compared to M1 macrophages. While macrophages unstimulated by wound signaling exhibit some M2-like features, they differ notably in shape elongation and migration speed. In summary, this study provides a quantitative analysis of macrophage behavior during wound healing and suggests distinct behavioral landscapes across different macrophage activation states.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Seol Ah Park, Giulia Lupi, Resul Ozbilgic, Michal Kollar, Aneta A. Ozvat, Mai Nguyen-Chi, Karol Mikula. 2025-07-25. The Morpho-Kinetic Landscape of Macrophage Modes During Wound Healing in Zebrafish. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19314

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Triplication: an important component of the modern scientific method

A scientific-study protocol (defined) is designed to deliver results from which inductive inference is allowed. In the nineteenth century, triplication was introduced into the plant sciences and Fisher's p<0.05 rule (1925) incorporated into triple-result protocols designed to counter random/systematic errors which contribute to real-world variability. Aims were to: (1) classify replication protocols; (2) assess their prevalence in plant-science studies (published during one twenty-first-century year; for defined variable construct); (3) explore triplication rationale. Methods: a plant-sciences protocol-prevalence report was produced; experimental/associational-study proportions analyzed; and real-world-data proxies used to show confidence-interval-width patterns with increasing replicate number. Results: 25% plant-science studies analyzed showed triplication, including 11% triple-result protocols (including greater replicate numbers: 48%;17%, respectively). Theoretical considerations indicated that even if systematic errors predominate, (previously-known) square-root rules sometimes apply, contributing to triplication importance (exemplified by real-world-data proxies). Conclusions: Triplication was extensively applied in studies analysed. There are strong methodological reasons why triplication, rather than duplication/quadruplication, is the appropriate standard: triple-result protocols: (a) effectively reduce false positives to acceptable levels; (b) give qualitatively-different information (shape) from duplication; (c) have a large efficiency advantage (concerning confidence-interval widths) over quadruplication. Plant-science methodological standards remained high in the twenty-first century (at least in 2017), despite immense publication pressures.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

Cross-Domain Transfer of Depression Voice Biomarkers Depends on the Outcome Instrument: Leakage-Controlled Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study

Whether voice biomarkers of depression generalize across clinical settings is largely untested. Generalization is usually framed as a question about populations. It is also a question about the outcome instrument a model is scored against, a dimension confounded in existing studies with all else that differs between them. In a US-nationwide online study, 446 sessions from 390 pregnant participants at 22 weeks' gestation (analytical N=316) each gave four voice recordings, the PHQ-8 and a modified 9-item EPDS (mEPDS-9). Discrimination was assessed under leakage-controlled cross-validation, with feature and classifier selection inside training folds only, gated by a permutation negative-control harness, across a pre-specified 4 task x 4 outcome grid with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment. The model was applied to DAIC-WOZ (N=189) and E-DAIC (N=219) under held-out inference; an open-source model trained on ~35,000 individuals was applied to all three cohorts without refitting. The pre-registered within-cohort outcome was at chance (AUC 0.494, 95% CI 0.431-0.560) and no grid cell survived adjustment under either modeling paradigm. The prenatal-trained model did not transfer (0.505, 0.478). Transfer in the reverse direction varied with the outcome instrument: the general-population model reached 0.706-0.708 on general-psychiatric speech, 0.510 (0.411-0.609) against the PHQ-8, and 0.645 (0.541-0.744) against the mEPDS-9 in the same pregnant participants; paired difference 0.135 (0.019-0.248), unadjusted post-hoc p=0.021. Item-level analyses suggest an explanation, though only 1 of 17 tests survived adjustment. The mEPDS-9 used a generic response scale, not the published EPDS anchors, so its thresholds are operational, not validated. Validation should specify population, task and instrument together.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

Representation learning of human cortical folding to reveal long lasting neurodevelopmental signatures

The human brain folds in utero, primarily during late gestation. Shortly after birth, cortical folding patterns are established and remain stable thereafter, making them promising early neurodevelopmental markers. Yet it is unclear whether the representations given by current neuroimaging foundation models capture cortical folding variability. Here, we introduce Champollion, a self-supervised learning framework that learns interpretable local representations of cortical folding from structural MRI. Optimized on representative folding-related tasks, Champollion accurately captures known folding patterns across cortical regions and external datasets. In a comprehensive benchmark, it consistently outperforms neuroimaging and general-purpose foundation models. Furthermore, Champollion reveals richer genetic associations than conventional morphometric descriptors and identifies localized folding signatures associated with incomplete hippocampal inversion, prematurity, and maternal smoking. These results establish cortical folding as a rich and largely untapped source of neurodevelopmental information, and Champollion provides a unified framework for discovering, localizing and interpreting long lasting cortical folding signatures.

q-bio.QM↗