arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.13919

The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AI

Kobi Hackenburg·Ben M. Tappin·Luke Hewitt·Ed Saunders·Sid Black·Hause Lin·Catherine Fist·Helen Margetts·David G. Rand·Christopher Summerfield
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There are widespread fears that conversational AI could soon exert unprecedented influence over human beliefs. Here, in three large-scale experiments (N=76,977), we deployed 19 LLMs-including some post-trained explicitly for persuasion-to evaluate their persuasiveness on 707 political issues. We then checked the factual accuracy of 466,769 resulting LLM claims. Contrary to popular concerns, we show that the persuasive power of current and near-future AI is likely to stem more from post-training and prompting methods-which boosted persuasiveness by as much as 51% and 27% respectively-than from personalization or increasing model scale. We further show that these methods increased persuasion by exploiting LLMs' unique ability to rapidly access and strategically deploy information and that, strikingly, where they increased AI persuasiveness they also systematically decreased factual accuracy.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kobi Hackenburg, Ben M. Tappin, Luke Hewitt, Ed Saunders, Sid Black, Hause Lin, Catherine Fist, Helen Margetts, David G. Rand, Christopher Summerfield. 2025-07-18. The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13919

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Lost-in-the-Middle in Long-Text Generation: Synthetic Dataset, Evaluation Framework, and Mitigation

Existing long-text generation methods produce lengthy outputs from short inputs, leaving long-input-to-long-output generation underexplored. As input length increases, LLMs increasingly overlook information in the middle of the context--a limitation known as the "lost-in-the-middle" phenomenon--leading to inconsistent and incoherent outputs. To address this problem, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Long-Text Writer (RAL-Writer), a training-free framework consisting of a Planner that generates writing steps and a Writer that produces content according to these steps. The Writer jointly models semantic relevance and positional bias to compute importance scores, dynamically retrieve critical input segments, and strategically restate them. We also construct a benchmark dataset for long-input-to-long-output generation and introduce three evaluation metrics covering length, consistency, and quality. We evaluate RAL-Writer against comparable baselines on this dataset. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Code is available at https://github.com/OnlyAR/RAL-Writer.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

SDUs DAISY: A Benchmark for Danish Culture

We introduce Daisy, a factual knowledge benchmark for Danish cultural heritage, based on curated topics from the Danish Culture Canon 2006. For each artifact in the culture canon, we query the corresponding Wikipedia page and have a language model generate a diverse set of questions. Within each artifact, we sample both central and peripheral questions, testing not only mainstream information but also the deeper, defining elements of Danish cultural heritage as identified by the Canon committee. Each question-answer pair is manually approved or corrected, yielding a final dataset of 741 closed-ended question-answer pairs ranging from archaeological findings dated to 1300 BCE and 18th-century poems and musical pieces through to contemporary pop music, Danish design, and architecture. Baseline results on our benchmark show that contemporary language models (GPT-OSS-120B & 20B, Llama-3.3-70B, Gemma3-27B, and Mistral-3.1-24B) perform surprisingly poorly on this task, despite the tested factual knowledge being available on Wikipedia. The best-performing model, Llama-3.3-70B, attains only 0.17 BLEU and an F1 score of 0.27, demonstrating the benchmark's difficulty. The questions, model benchmarks, and the evaluation tool are publicly available at https://github.com/schneiderkamplab/SDU-Daisy and under schneiderkamplab/SDU-Daisy on Hugging Face Datasets.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Is my model perplexed for the right reason? Contrasting LLMs' Benchmark Behavior with Token-Level Perplexity

Standard evaluations of Large language models (LLMs) focus on task performance, offering limited insight into whether correct behavior reflects appropriate underlying mechanisms and risking confirmation bias. We introduce a simple, principled interpretability framework based on token-level perplexity to test whether models rely on linguistically relevant cues. By comparing perplexity distributions over minimal sentence pairs differing in one or a few `pivotal' tokens, our method enables precise, hypothesis-driven analysis without relying on unstable feature-attribution techniques. Experiments on controlled linguistic benchmarks with several open-weight LLMs show that, while linguistically important tokens influence model behavior, they never fully explain perplexity shifts, revealing that models rely on heuristics other than the expected linguistic ones.

cs.CL↗