arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2507.11808

New allocation rule based on graph structures and their application to economic phenomena

Abstract

This study introduces an edge-based Shapley value, a novel allocation rule in cooperative game theory tailored specifically to supply chain networks, where value is generated through edge-mediated interactions.Traditional allocation rules, such as the Shapley value and Myerson value, evaluate player contributions based on node-level characteristics or connected components.However, these approaches often fail to adequately capture the functional role of edges that represent supply routes with associated costs and flow volumes. Our edge-based Shapley value shifts the characteristic function from node sets to edge sets, thereby enabling a more granular and context-sensitive evaluation of supplier contributions. We establish its theoretical foundations, demonstrate its relationship to classical allocation rules, and show that it retains key properties such as fairness and symmetry. We apply the method to supply chain networks by incorporating route-specific supply quantities and transportation costs via a cost-decaying weight function, and validate the approach through a systematic empirical benchmark on seven distinct supply network topologies, spanning serial, parallel-redundant, asymmetric tier, scale-free, clustered, layered DAG, and single-point-of-failure structures. Furthermore, we show that ESV rankings are more robust to prior network disruption than the single-node removal measure: when portions of the network have already failed, the ESV computed on the original intact network predicts the remaining nodes' importance more accurately than the single-node removal measure, because the Shapley value inherently averages over all possible degradation states.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Taiki Yamada, Taisuke Matsubae, Tomoya Akamatsu. 2025-07-16. New allocation rule based on graph structures and their application to economic phenomena. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11808

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT