arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.21128

Tractable Metric Spaces and Magnitude Continuity

Sara Kališnik·Davorin Lešnik
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Magnitude is an isometric invariant of metric spaces introduced by Leinster. Since its inception, it has inspired active research into its connections with integral geometry, geometric measure theory, fractal dimensions, persistent homology, and applications in machine learning. In particular, when it comes to applications, continuity and stability of invariants play an important role. Although it has been shown that magnitude is nowhere continuous on the Gromov--Hausdorff space of finite metric spaces, positive results are possible if we restrict the ambient space. In this paper, we introduce the notion of tractable metric spaces, provide a characterization of these spaces, and establish several continuity results for magnitude in this setting. As a consequence, we offer a new proof of a known result stating that magnitude is continuous on the space of compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ with respect to the Hausdorff metric. Furthermore, we show that the magnitude function is Lipschitz when restricted to bounded subspaces of $\mathbb{R}$.

Explore related subjects

math.GN

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sara Kališnik, Davorin Lešnik. 2026-03-02. Tractable Metric Spaces and Magnitude Continuity. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.70380

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The circle as a topological fractal

We prove that no family of two continuous self-maps witnesses that the circle is a topological fractal, answering a question of Karasová and the present author. Since three maps are known to suffice, this bound is optimal. In contrast, for every $\varepsilon>0$ there are two continuous self-maps of the circle, depending on $\varepsilon$, whose images cover the circle and an integer $N$ such that every composition of $N$ of them has image of diameter less than $\varepsilon$. Thus two maps suffice at any prescribed scale, but no fixed pair works at all scales.

math.GN↗
arXiv2026

Finite-Point Metrizable Coarsenings: Compatible Gauges, Simplicial Metrics, and Hausdorff Lower Bounds

Let $(X,τ)$ be metrizable and let $F=\{a_1,\ldots,a_k\}\subseteq X$, where $2\le k<\infty$. We represent all metrizable topologies $σ\subseteqτ$ agreeing with $τ$ on $X\setminus F$ by compatible systems of continuous gauges $s_i:X\to[0,1]$ with $s_i^{-1}(0)=\{a_i\}$. The condition $\inf_X\max\{s_i,s_j\}>0$ for $i\ne j$ is equivalent to both Hausdorffness and metrizability of the prescribed gauge topology. A normalized product map into the standard simplex gives an explicit metric; its triangle inequality follows from a simplex slack inequality. This metric is complete whenever the auxiliary bounded compatible metric is complete. For two compatible systems, their coordinatewise minimum describes the intersection topology. It is compatible exactly when the two coarsenings have a common Hausdorff lower bound; in that case the intersection is metrizable and is their meet. Otherwise every common lower topology is non-Hausdorff. A closed-discrete construction produces such an obstructed pair for every noncompact metrizable space and every finite exceptional set with at least two points. Consequently, for these exceptional sets, the family is downward directed, or is a lattice, if and only if $(X,τ)$ is compact, in which case it consists only of $τ$.

math.GN↗
arXiv2026

Journey into special $T_1$-spaces

In this survey, we review certain types of special \(T_{1}\) spaces and their associated fixed-point theorems. Kupka introduced the notion of a feeble topological contraction, which naturally generalizes Lipschitz contractions defined on metric spaces. Specifically, Kupka established a fixed-point theorem for feeble topological contractions possessing a closed graph within the product of arbitrary \(T_{0}\) spaces. Furthermore, the \(T_{1}\) separation axiom is shown to guaranty the uniqueness of such fixed points. Finally, we discuss peripheral Hausdorff and locally Hausdorff spaces within the context of these fixed-point results.

math.GN↗