arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2506.18240

Towards Provable and Scalable Training of Quantized Neural Networks with Ising Optimization

Abstract

Training quantized neural networks remains fundamentally challenging due to non-convex loss landscapes and discrete parameter spaces. We introduce an exact Quadratic Constrained Binary Optimization (QCBO) framework with provable guarantees. We first characterize the stratified topology of network zero-loss level sets: generic interior strata are smooth, yet globally optimal components can remain disconnected even under overparameterization. To address this non-convex obstruction, we compile finite-depth architectures with parameter codebooks and Forward Interval Propagation (FIP)-bounded states into bounded QCBOs, yielding an exact completely positive convex formulation that preserves the global discrete optimum with zero relaxation gap. To overcome monolithic sample scaling, we formulate sample-wise Decomposed Lower-Bound Optimization (DLBO) to reduce each Ising call from dataset to single-sample scale. The DLBO moment hierarchy also forms a Hamiltonian-locality hierarchy, with order two giving an auxiliary-free pairwise QUBO oracle and higher orders trading interaction locality for tighter bounds. Strictly feasible discrete parameters are recovered via Spectral--ADMM and randomized rounding. Experiments on a coherent Ising machine achieve $94.95\%$ accuracy on binary Fashion-MNIST (coats vs. sandals) at 1.1-bit precision, demonstrating resilience against low-bit representational collapse. Multi-class DLBO evaluations on 3-class Fashion-MNIST, 3-class Wine, and 3-class Digits further validate scalable convergence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wenxin Li, Chuan Wang, Hongdong Zhu, Qi Gao, Yin Ma, Hai Wei, Kai Wen. 2025-06-23. Towards Provable and Scalable Training of Quantized Neural Networks with Ising Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18240

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG