arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.03572

Extendible cardinals, and Laver-generic large cardinal axioms for extendibility

Sakaé Fuchino
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce (super-$C^{(\infty)}$-)Laver-generic large cardinal axioms for extendibility ((super-$C^{(\infty)}$-)LgLCAs for extendible, for short), and show that most of the previously known consequences of the (super-$C^{(\infty)}$-)LgLCAs for ultrahuge, in particular, general forms of Resurrection Principles, Maximality Principles, and Absoluteness Theorems, already follow from (super-$C^{(\infty)}$\mbox{-)}LgLCAs for extendible. The consistency of LgLCAs for extendible (for transfinitely iterable $Σ_2$-definable classes of posets) follows from an extendible cardinal while the consistency of super-$C^{(\infty)}$-LgLCAs for extendible follows from a model with a strongly super-$C^{(\infty)}$-extendible cardinal. If $μ$ is an almost-huge cardinal, there are cofinally many $κ<μ$ such that\ $V_μ\models$``$κ$ is strongly super-$C^{(\infty)}$ extendible''. Most of the known reflection properties follow already from some of the LgLCAs for supercompact. We give a survey on the related results. We also show the separation between some of the LgLCAs as well as between LgLCAs and their consequences. LgLCAs are generic large cardinal axioms in terms of generic elementary embeddings with the critical point $κ_{\mathfrak{refl}}=\max\{\aleph_2,2^{\aleph_0}\}$. We show that Laver generic large cardinal axioms for all posets\ in terms of generic elementary embeddings with the critical point $2^{\aleph_0}$ is also possible. We abbreviate this type of axiom for the notion of extendibility as the LgLCAA for extendible and examine its consequences.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sakaé Fuchino. 2025-06-24. Extendible cardinals, and Laver-generic large cardinal axioms for extendibility. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗