arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.03187

Comparing Retrieval Strategies to Capture Interdisciplinary Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Evaluation of the Integration of Neuroscience and Computer Science

Malena Mendez Isla·Agustin Mauro·Diego Kozlowski
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Interdisciplinary scientific research is increasingly important in knowledge production, funding policies, and academic discussions on scholarly communication. While many studies focus on interdisciplinary corpora defined a priori -- usually through keyword-based searches within assumed interdisciplinary domains -- few explore interdisciplinarity as an emergent intersection between two distinct fields. Thus, methodological proposals for building databases at the intersection of two fields of knowledge are scarce. The goal of this article is to develop and compare different strategies for defining an interdisciplinary corpus between two bodies of knowledge. As a case study, we focus on the intersection between neuroscience and computer science. To this end, we develop and compare four retrieval strategies, two of them based on keywords and two based on citation and reference patterns. Our results show that the reference-based strategy provides better retrieval, pseudorecall, and F1. While we focus on comparing strategies for the study of the intersection between the fields of neuroscience and computer science, this methodological reflection is applicable to a wide range of interdisciplinary domains.

Explore related subjects

cs.DLcs.IR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Malena Mendez Isla, Agustin Mauro, Diego Kozlowski. 2025-10-28. Comparing Retrieval Strategies to Capture Interdisciplinary Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Evaluation of the Integration of Neuroscience and Computer Science. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03187

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Towards Large Language Models for Lunar Mission Planning and In Situ Resource Utilization

A key factor for lunar mission planning is the ability to assess the local availability of raw materials. However, many potentially relevant measurements are scattered across a variety of scientific publications. In this paper we consider the viability of obtaining lunar composition data by leveraging LLMs to rapidly process a corpus of scientific publications. While leveraging LLMs to obtain knowledge from scientific documents is not new, this particular application presents interesting challenges due to the heterogeneity of lunar samples and the nuances involved in their characterization. Accuracy and uncertainty quantification are particularly crucial since many materials properties can be sensitive to small variations in composition. Our findings indicate that off-the-shelf LLMs are generally effective at extracting data from tables commonly found in these documents. However, there remains opportunity to further refine the data we extract in this initial approach; in particular, to capture fine-grained mineralogy information and to improve performance on more subtle/complex pieces of information.

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

Bridging openEHR and OMOP: Expanded Mappings and Systematic Analysis of Semantic and Structural Limitations in the OMOP CDM

Background: Interoperability between clinical and research data systems is essential for enabling secondary use of EHR data. The openEHR standard provides structured, model-driven clinical information, while the OMOP Common Data Model (CDM) supports large-scale observational analytics. The Eos engine and OMOP Conversion Language (OMOCL) previously introduced a standards-based transformation approach, but limited value set support, rigid visit generation, and incomplete mapping coverage restricted broader applicability. Methods: A new generation of Eos and OMOCL was implemented to improve semantic completeness and address earlier limitations. New functionality enables mapping of internal openEHR value sets via conceptMaps, supports visit occurrence generation using Archetype Query Language (AQL), and expands the international archetype mapping library. The framework was evaluated by assessing mapping coverage, terminology completeness, and domain distribution. Structural constraints of OMOP were examined using representative archetype mappings. Results: 196 openEHR archetypes were mapped, covering all stable archetypes in the international Clinical Knowledge Manager with OMOP-equivalent tables. 8.65% of primary concept identifiers could not be linked to OMOP standard terminologies. Most mappings targeted the Measurement (50.5%) and Observation (41.0%) domains. Structural analysis showed that coherent clinical concepts often required fragmentation across multiple loosely connected OMOP tables; the Problem/Diagnosis archetype alone required more than 20 linked records. Conclusions: The new framework strengthens openEHR-OMOP interoperability and reduces information loss. However, structural and semantic limitations within OMOP introduce fragmentation that may affect downstream analytics, suggesting a need for greater convergence between both ecosystems.

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

Debiasing as a Measurement Intervention: Calibrated Ties and Resolution Loss in LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation

LLM-as-a-judge protocols are commonly debiased by instructing judges to ignore presentation cues such as citation formatting, source labels, and evidence-display style. We show that this intervention can suppress bias while damaging the resolution of the measurement instrument. We introduce TraceJudgeBench, a diagnostic benchmark for auditing citation-like artifacts in RAG and agent-workflow evaluation, covering content-equivalent pairs, citation ablations, correctness conflicts, human-validated soft and moderate quality gaps, prompt-strength ladders, decoupled judging, and a controlled workflow-ranking probe. Across GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and DeepSeek V4-Flash, stronger anti-citation prompts reduce worse-cited wins from up to 50.5% to 0%; yet some operating points already convert validated moderate-gap decisions into Tie before the strict stress-test endpoint, while correctness-conflict accuracy remains at or above 93.0%. A second, 50-pair FinQA moderate-gap construction reproduces the qualitative frontier, and open-weight Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-AWQ and Gemma-3-12B-IT runs reproduce the central HotpotQA frontier. TRACE-style decoupling recovers 96.5-100.0% better-plain resolution across the reported settings. Human validation separates three meanings of Tie: correct equivalence Tie, calibrated soft-boundary Tie, and resolution-destroying Tie on validated quality gaps. We frame debiasing as a measurement intervention whose bias suppression, resolution retention, Tie cost, and protocol cost must be reported jointly. The supplementary artifact contains benchmark splits, prompts, raw judge outputs, validation summaries, and analysis.

cs.DL↗