arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2505.23043

Cross-Task Generalization Between Understanding and Generation in Unified Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Study

Abstract

Unified vision-language models (VLMs) aim to support both visual understanding and generation within a single framework, but it remains unclear when mixed training benefits both capabilities and when it introduces conflicts. This paper presents a controlled empirical study of cross-task generalization between understanding and generation in unified VLMs. We construct two controllable image-text benchmarks, SmartWatch and modified CelebA, with paired VQA, captioning, and text-to-image generation tasks, and evaluate multiple LLM-based unified architectures built from SigLIP and VQ-VAE visual spaces. Our experiments show that mixed understanding-generation training can improve both tasks over task-specific training, but the benefit depends strongly on the relation between vision input and output spaces. Unified models with better aligned visual spaces exhibit stronger cross-task transfer, while reversible affine distortions of the input visual space substantially weaken this effect and can turn mutual benefits into conflicts. We further find that increasing data from one task can initially improve the other, but excessive imbalance between understanding and generation data may degrade the complementary task. By controlling attribute frequencies, we show that generation supervision can help recover underrepresented visual concepts for understanding. Adapter analyses suggest that this transfer is not primarily caused by richer visual adapter features, but by the base language model learning relationships that generalize across aligned visual spaces. A real-case experiment on LLaVA provides additional evidence that mixed understanding-generation training can benefit visual understanding beyond controlled benchmarks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jihai Zhang, Tianle Li, Linjie Li, Zhengyuan Yang, Yu Cheng. 2026-09-04. Cross-Task Generalization Between Understanding and Generation in Unified Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23043

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV