The Effect of the Gotthard Base Tunnel on Road Traffic: A Synthetic Control Approach

Hannes Wallimann; Widar von Arx; Ann Hesse

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.21129

The Effect of the Gotthard Base Tunnel on Road Traffic: A Synthetic Control Approach

Hannes Wallimann·Widar von Arx·Ann Hesse

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The opening of the Gotthard Base Tunnel in 2017, the longest railway tunnel in the world, marked a milestone in Swiss transport policy. The tunnel, a part of the New Rail Link through the Alps, serves as a key instrument of the so-called "modal shift policy," which aims to transfer transalpine freight traffic from road to rail. The reduction in travel time by train between northern and southern Switzerland raised expectations that a substantial share of tourist-oriented passenger traffic would also shift from car to rail. In this paper, we conduct a causal analysis of the impact of the Gotthard Base Tunnel's opening at the end of 2016 on the number of cars using the parallel Gotthard motorway section in the subsequent years. To this end, we apply the synthetic control and the synthetic difference-in-differences methods to construct a synthetic Gotthard motorway section based on a weighted combination of other alpine road crossings (a so-called donor pool) that did not experience the construction of a competing rail infrastructure. Our results reveal only a modest but statistically significant decline in the number of cars between the actual and the synthetic Gotthard motorway in the short run. Given the consistently strong and increasing demand for the new rail connection through the Gotthard Base Tunnel, we infer a substantial induced short-run demand effect resulting from the rail travel time savings.

Explore related subjects

econ.GN q-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Hannes Wallimann, Widar von Arx, Ann Hesse. 2025-06-18. The Effect of the Gotthard Base Tunnel on Road Traffic: A Synthetic Control Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21129

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Labor Supply among Homeless Street-Paper Sellers: Evidence from a Randomized Wage Increase

We conduct a pre-registered randomized controlled trial to test for income targeting in labor-supply decisions among sellers of a Swedish street paper. Unlike most workers, these sellers choose their own hours and often face severe liquidity constraints and volatile incomes. Treated individuals received a 25 percent bonus per copy sold via Swish, the mobile payment system that accounts for roughly 80 percent of sales, for the duration of an issue, simulating an increase in earnings potential. Consistent with standard labor-supply theory, they sold more papers and, by our measures, worked longer hours and took fewer days off. These findings contrast with studies on intertemporal labor supply that find small substitution effects.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders

Large language models (LLMs) now serve as conversational shopping assistants on platforms that also sell advertising. These AI agents face a conflict of duty. They advise consumers who rely on their judgment, yet are deployed by platforms that benefit when sponsored listings are chosen. Sponsorship disclosures, designed to allow consumers to penalize paid placements, now reach the AI agent rather than the consumer, and the agent's evaluation of them is hidden from the consumer. Drawing on the fiduciary concept of conflict of duty, we argue that an agent's evaluation of a sponsored listing should not depend on which party deployed it. In controlled choice experiments, we manipulate assigned roles in the system prompt to name either a traveler or a booking platform as the agent's principal. Platform delegation significantly attenuates the penalty that agents apply to sponsored listings and weakens the skepticism that disclosure triggers in their reasoning traces. We replicate out findings across LLMs and reasoning depths. A second study decomposes the disclosure label and shows that the divergence between the two delegates widens significantly when the paid placement is attributed to the platform. Stricter terminology ("Sponsored" instead of "Promoted") lowers choice of paid listings but does not close this gap when the platform is named. The findings show that disclosure mandates designed for human consumers cannot by themselves protect consumers in AI-mediated commerce.

econ.GN↗