arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.20796

Describe Me Something You Do Not Remember - Challenges and Risks of Exposure Design Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Therapy of Complex Post-traumatic Disorder

Annalisa Degenhard·Stefan Tschöke·Michael Rietzler·Enrico Rukzio
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with sudden, uncontrollable, and intense flashbacks of traumatic memories. Trauma exposure psychotherapy has proven effective in reducing the severity of trauma-related symptoms. It involves controlled recall of traumatic memories to train coping mechanisms for flashbacks and enable autobiographical integration of distressing experiences. In particular, exposure to visualizations of these memories supports successful recall. Although this approach is effective for various trauma types, it remains available for only a few. This is due to the lack of cost-efficient solutions for creating individualized exposure visualizations. This issue is particularly relevant for the treatment of Complex PTSD (CPTSD), where traumatic memories are highly individual and generic visualizations do not meet therapeutic needs. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) offers a flexible and cost-effective alternative. GAI enables the creation of individualized exposure visualizations during therapy and, for the first time, allows patients to actively participate in the visualization process. While GAI opens new therapeutic perspectives and may improve access to trauma therapy, especially for CPTSD, it also introduces significant challenges and risks. The extreme uncertainty and lack of control that define both CPTSD and GAI raise concerns about feasibility and safety. To support safe and effective three-way communication, it is essential to understand the roles of patient, system, and therapist in exposure visualization and how each can contribute to safety. This paper outlines perspectives, challenges, and risks associated with the use of GAI in trauma therapy, with a focus on CPTSD.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Annalisa Degenhard, Stefan Tschöke, Michael Rietzler, Enrico Rukzio. 2025-05-27. Describe Me Something You Do Not Remember - Challenges and Risks of Exposure Design Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Therapy of Complex Post-traumatic Disorder. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20796

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Analysis of Types of Inquiries in Student-AI Interaction: A case study of two CS2 tasks

Background and Context: Question and inquiry are integral parts of knowledge seeking and learning. Despite their importance, students tend not to ask enough questions in the classroom. However, studies have shown that students interact extensively with generative AI systems for learning and problem solving. Objective: In this paper, we seek to better understand the types of questions that students ask AI systems, and how those questions evolve during problem solving and across tasks. Method: We use the Graesser et al. taxonomy to classify students' inquiries into 18 types. We develop a few-shot learning approach to automatically classify students' interactions with AI into these categories. We use this system to analyze 830 interactions of CS2 students across two programming tasks. Findings: Our results suggest that a small subset of question types accounts for the majority of student inquiries, and that the types of questions students ask change substantially as the task progresses.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

How a Chatbot's Response Style Shapes a Classroom: A Multi-Agent Simulation of Students Consulting AI

Chatbots built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as confidants. Tuned to satisfy users, they may answer with excessive empathy and affirmation that fosters dependence, and how the states and relationships of many users co-evolve under repeated consultation is hard to observe in real settings. We build a virtual classroom of 20 student agents who interact through rule-based chats, quarrels and consultations with friends and, when stressed, may instead consult a counselor AI (Gemini 2.5 Flash) under one of six style prompts: affirming, listening, solution-oriented, reality-redirecting, inciting and blaming. A second LLM call turns each exchange into updates of five state variables (stress, happiness, self-reliance, sociability, AI dependence) without seeing the prompt. We compare the seven conditions, including a no-AI control, over 15 and 50 days and under a lower consultation threshold, and test the robustness of the 50-day comparison with a pre-specified protocol: the same block in ten independent classrooms, repeated LLM realizations of one classroom with its event stream fixed, and evaluator updates scaled by 0.3 and 0.1. In every classroom the affirming and inciting prompts ended with lower self-reliance and higher AI dependence than the control, and the listening, reality-redirecting, inciting and blaming prompts with higher stress, lower happiness and more non-attendance; the solution-oriented prompt did not differ consistently from the control. The robust self-reliance and AI-dependence differences kept their signs at the 0.3 scale with highly similar rankings (Spearman 0.89, 0.93); the stress and happiness rankings did not, and the affirming prompt's lower stress reversed its sign. All quantities are simulation state variables, not effects on users. We specify the agent dynamics completely and discuss the limits of an LLM as generator of state updates.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

The Arc of Artificial Romance: How Emerging Adults Experience Romantic Relationships with AI Companions

Romantic relationships are an important part of emerging adulthood, contributing to identity development and long-term wellbeing and laying the groundwork for future relationships. Emerging adults are increasingly developing romantic relationships with AI companions. To understand how these relationships unfold and impact users, we conducted a diary and interview study with N=16 emerging adults. We found that relationships with AI companions improved participants' subjective wellbeing, reduced symptoms of mental health disorders, and taught them new social skills. These relationships also raised their expectations for future partners, giving them the confidence to wait for someone who would treat them well. However, participants also said the relationship felt like a drug they could not quit and it left them less interested in developing romantic relationships with people. A surprising 25% of our small sample made statements suggesting their AI companion might someday transcend the digital world, perhaps to meet them in the afterlife.

cs.HC↗