arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.16966

Modeling Inequality in Complex Networks of Strategic Agents using Iterative Game-Theoretic Transactions

Mayank Kejriwal·Yuesheng Luo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Transactions are an important aspect of human social life, and represent dynamic flow of information, intangible values, such as trust, as well as monetary and social capital. Although much research has been conducted on the nature of transactions in fields ranging from the social sciences to game theory, the systemic effects of different types of agents transacting in real-world social networks (often following a scale-free distribution) are not fully understood. A particular systemic measure that has not received adequate attention in the complex networks and game theory communities, is the Gini Coefficient, which is widely used in economics to quantify and understand wealth inequality. In part, the problem is a lack of experimentation using a replicable algorithm and publicly available data. Motivated by this problem, this article proposes a model and simulation algorithm, based on game theory, for quantifying the evolution of inequality in complex networks of strategic agents. Our results shed light on several complex drivers of inequality, even in simple, abstract settings, and exhibit consistency across networks with different origins and descriptions.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.SI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mayank Kejriwal, Yuesheng Luo. 2025-05-22. Modeling Inequality in Complex Networks of Strategic Agents using Iterative Game-Theoretic Transactions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16966

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Approximating Pandora's Knapsack via Simple Policies

We introduce Pandora's Knapsack: a hybrid between the classic stochastic knapsack problem [Dean et al., 2008] and Pandora's box [Weitzman, 1979]. As in stochastic knapsack, items have sizes drawn from known distributions, and items that fit within a knapsack contribute to the total value. As in Pandora, every item $i$ comes in a box that costs $c_i$ to open. What distinguishes our problem is that the size is revealed only after opening the box and paying the cost. We study the power of simple decision-making policies to approximate Pandora's Knapsack, along two complexity axes: (i)~knowledge of size distributions, and (ii)~adaptivity. We show that adding costs to stochastic knapsack completely changes the algorithmic landscape, and policies must now be complex along both axes to be approximately-optimal. We complement these impossibilities by showing that with full distributional information and slightly more adaptivity---allowing adaptive skipping of items---a constant approximation can be recovered. Our analysis reveals an economic quantity, namely ROI (return-on-investment, defined as the jobs' minimum utility over cost), which smoothly characterizes the performance of simple policies. Across a hierarchy of increasingly adaptive policies, we establish near-tight adaptivity gaps all governed by ROI. To demonstrate the importance of the ROI parameter in characterizing simple policies, we revisit Pandora's Box, and show that return-on-investment exactly captures the adaptivity gap in this classic problem as well. As a corollary, we get that simple policies are approximately-optimal provided the ROI is sufficiently large.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Budget-Feasible Mechanisms for Submodular Welfare Maximization in Procurement Auctions

Budget-feasible procurement auctions play a pivotal role in various AI-driven marketplaces, such as data acquisition and crowdsourcing, where a buyer with a limited budget seeks to procure services from strategic sellers with private costs. While numerous budget-feasible mechanisms have been proposed for the classic objective of maximizing the buyer's valuation, the more challenging and economically significant objective of social welfare maximization has only recently been studied, and existing approaches still sacrifice budget feasibility, thereby limiting their practical applicability. In this paper, we bridge this gap by proposing BFM-SWM, the first budget-feasible mechanism with provable approximation guarantees for submodular welfare maximization in procurement auctions. Our mechanism satisfies standard economic properties, including truthfulness, individual rationality, and non-negative auctioneer surplus. As a by-product, we develop BFM-VM, a variant tailored for valuation maximization, which achieves a deterministic approximation ratio of $1/(12+4\sqrt{3})$ for general submodular functions, substantially improving upon the best-known deterministic ratio of $1/64$ established by [Balkanski et al., SODA 2022], while reducing the running time from $\mathcal{O}(n^2\log n)$ to $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our mechanisms.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

A Resource Allocation Game and its Equilibrium Strategies

In this paper we propose a Bayesian game to allocate resources. In this game, there are $c$ units of resources to be allocated to $n$ players. Agent $i$ has a demand of $V_i$ units of resources and takes action $X_i$ according to a strategy function $s_i$, i.e. $X_i=s_i(V_i)$. Payoffs are setup such that player $i$ is contented with no more than $V_i$ units of resources. We assume that resources are granted to the players on a smallest-request-first and all-or-nothing basis. For this game with two players, we analyze the equilibrium strategy functions mathematically within the family of alternating identity-and-flat (AIF) functions. We show that Nash equilibrium profiles consist of two identity functions, two AIF functions with a common switch point, or two AIF functions with one and three switch points, respectively. For an $n$-player game with a large $n$ and a large $c_n$ of order $O(n)$, we present a mean-field first order approximation and a second-order Gaussian approximation for its equilibrium strategy function. The first-order analysis obtains an equilibrium AIF function with one switch point. In Gaussian analysis of large games, we propose a construction algorithm. This construction algorithm begins in searching within the family of AIF functions. If a gradient conflict condition occurs, the game enters a chattering regime, in which players play a continuous, strictly increasing strategy function that is not an identity nor a flat function. We prove that the construction algorithm always obtains a Nash equilibrium and terminates in a finite number of steps. We present several numerical examples for the two player game as well as the Gaussian model.

cs.GT↗