arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2505.14379

Two Empirical Studies on Audiovisual Semiotics of Uncertainty

Abstract

There exists limited theoretical guidance on integrating visualization and sonification. In this paper, we address this gap by investigating audiovisual semiotics for uncertainty representation: joining uncertainty visualization and sonification to combine audiovisual channels for enhancing users' perception of uncertainty. We conducted two preregistered crowd-sourced user studies. First, we assessed suitable audio/visual pairs. Then, we investigated audiovisual mappings of uncertainty. Here, we use probability as it is an easily communicated aspect of uncertainty. We analyzed the participants' preferences and reaction times in both user studies. Additionally, we explored the strategies employed by participants through qualitative analysis. Our results reveal audiovisual mappings that lead to particularly strong preferences and low reaction times. Furthermore, we found that preferred audio/visual pairs are not necessarily suitable audiovisual mappings of uncertainty. For example, while pitch paired with brightness was preferred as a pair, it was not well suited as a mapping for uncertainty. We recommend audiovisual mappings of uncertainty that lead to low reaction times and high preferences in both user studies. This paper presents guidelines to anyone seeking to employ audiovisual representations for uncertainty, contributing to enhancing the perception of uncertainty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sita Vriend, David Hägele, Daniel Weiskopf. 2025-05-20. Two Empirical Studies on Audiovisual Semiotics of Uncertainty. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14379

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC