arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.08300

Exploring Challenges in Test Mocking: Developer Questions and Insights from StackOverflow

Mumtahina Ahmed·Md Nahidul Islam Opu·Chanchal Roy·Sujana Islam Suhi·Shaiful Chowdhury
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mocking is a common unit testing technique that is used to simplify tests, reduce flakiness, and improve coverage by replacing real dependencies with simplified implementations. Despite its widespread use in Open Source Software projects, there is limited understanding of how and why developers use mocks and the challenges they face. In this collaborative study, we have analyzed 25,302 questions related to Mocking on STACKOVERFLOW to identify the challenges faced by developers. We have used Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling, identified 30 key topics, and grouped the topics into five key categories. Consequently, we analyzed the annual and relative probabilities of each category to understand the evolution of mocking-related discussions. Trend analysis reveals that category like Advanced Programming peaked between 2009 and 2012 but have since declined, while categories such as Mocking Techniques and External Services have remained consistently dominant, highlighting evolving developer priorities and ongoing technical challenges. Our findings also show an inverse relationship between a topic's popularity and its difficulty. Popular topics like Framework Selection tend to have lower difficulty and faster resolution times, while complex topics like HTTP Requests and Responses are more likely to remain unanswered and take longer to resolve. A classification of questions into How, Why, What, and Other revealed that over 70% are How questions, particularly in practical domains like file access and APIs, indicating a strong need for implementation guidance. Why questions are more prevalent in error-handling contexts, reflecting conceptual challenges in debugging, while What questions are rare and mostly tied to theoretical discussions. These insights offer valuable guidance for improving developer support, tooling, and educational content in the context of mocking and unit testing.

Explore related subjects

cs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mumtahina Ahmed, Md Nahidul Islam Opu, Chanchal Roy, Sujana Islam Suhi, Shaiful Chowdhury. 2025-06-30. Exploring Challenges in Test Mocking: Developer Questions and Insights from StackOverflow. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08300

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Search-based Trace Diagnostic for Cyber-Physical Systems

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) development requires verifying whether system behaviors violate their requirements. This analysis often considers system behaviors expressed by execution traces and requirements expressed by signal-based temporal properties. When an execution trace violates a requirement, engineers must solve the trace diagnostic problem---they need to understand the cause of the breach. Automated trace diagnostic techniques aim to support engineers in the trace diagnostic activity. This paper proposes search-based trace diagnostic (SBTD), a novel trace diagnostic technique for CPS requirements. Unlike existing techniques, SBTD relies on evolutionary search. SBTD starts from a set of candidate diagnoses, applies an evolutionary algorithm to generate new candidate diagnoses (via mutation, recombination, and selection), and uses a fitness function to determine the qualities of these solutions. Then, a diagnostic generator step is performed to explain the cause of the trace violation. We implemented Diagnosis, an SBTD tool for signal-based temporal logic requirements expressed using the Hybrid Logic of Signals (HLS). We evaluated Diagnosis by performing 34 experiments for 17 trace-requirement combinations for property violations. We assessed the effectiveness of SBTD in producing informative diagnoses and its efficiency. Diagnosis achieved expert-aligned diagnoses for 29/34 experiments and scaled to the full HLS benchmark, whereas state-of-the-art literature remained restricted to a subset due to performance and language limitations. SBTD treats trace-checking as a black box, which makes the checker replaceable. Substituting our HLS checker for an STL monitor, e.g., RTAMT, reproduces on two requirements the diagnoses at two to three orders of magnitude lower per-check cost.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Toward Secure Code Generation: Bridging Correctness and Security via Task-Adaptive Vulnerability Modeling and Execution-Based Benchmarking

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for program synthesis, yet they often generate code that is functionally plausible but insecure. Progress in secure code generation has been hindered by benchmarks that are small, non-executable, leak mitigation details, or rely on noisy analyzers and subjective judgments, making it difficult to measure whether security improves without sacrificing correctness. We address these gaps with CodeSecEval, an execution-based benchmark for secure code generation, comprising 255 Python tasks spanning 77 CWE categories. Each task provides paired insecure and secure implementations together with executable functional and vulnerability-targeted security tests, enabling precise and reproducible evaluation of secure code generation and insecure-code repair. Building on CodeSecEval, we propose SecAwareCoder, an agent-based framework that shifts code generation toward secure-by-construction synthesis. SecAwareCoder performs task-adaptive threat modeling to identify security-sensitive regions and derive task-grounded vulnerability hypotheses, uses these hypotheses to guide both constraint-aware code generation and security-aware test synthesis, and leverages execution feedback for targeted refinement. Experiments across multiple LLM backbones show that SecAwareCoder consistently improves Pass@1 and security robustness over prompting and analyzer-driven baselines, narrowing the security--correctness gap in LLM code generation.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Enabling Communication via APIs for Mainframe Applications

Mainframe systems continue to support critical applications across industries such as banking, retail, and healthcare. Exposing their functionality through Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) enables reuse and development of new applications, but identifying and implementing APIs for legacy code remains challenging. It requires understanding complex programs, separating dependent components, introducing new artifacts, and preserving functionality and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) such as Turnaround Time (TAT). We propose a framework for APIfication of legacy mainframe applications. Candidate APIs are identified from artifacts such as transactions, screens, control-flow blocks, inter-microservice calls, business rules, and data accesses. Static analyses, including liveness and reaching definitions, are then used to traverse the code and automatically compute API signatures consisting of request and response fields. We evaluated the framework through a qualitative survey of nine mainframe developers with an average of 15 years of experience, using the public GENAPP application and two industrial mainframe applications. The results show that the framework identifies additional candidate APIs and reduces implementation effort for APIfication. The API-signature computation has been incorporated into IBM watsonx Code Assistant for Z Refactoring Assistant. We further validated the identified APIs by executing them on an IBM Z mainframe system, demonstrating the practical viability of the approach.

cs.SE↗