Emerging Media Use and Acceptance of Digital Immortality: A Cluster Analysis among Chinese Young Generations

Yi Mou; Jianfeng Lan; Jingyao Lu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.01355

Emerging Media Use and Acceptance of Digital Immortality: A Cluster Analysis among Chinese Young Generations

Yi Mou·Jianfeng Lan·Jingyao Lu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Digital immortality is increasingly discussed as a technological possibility, yet empirical evidence about potential users' evaluations remains limited. We surveyed 462 Chinese young adults, combining cluster analysis of four emerging-media use frequencies with valence coding of open-ended responses to physical death, physical immortality, digital immortality, and digital death. Three profiles emerged: broad emerging-media, gaming-focused, and low-use users. Broad emerging-media users reported the highest adjusted acceptance and scored higher on several personality and worldview measures, while fear of death did not differ across profiles. Physical immortality elicited the most negative responses; digital immortality produced more mixed, less negative appraisals. More favorable digital-immortality appraisals predicted higher acceptance after adjustment for media-use profile and demographics, although scenario valence did not differ across profiles. The findings distinguish general receptivity associated with emerging-media repertoires from emotional responses to specific imagined futures, showing that evaluations depend on the form of continuity envisioned.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY cs.ET

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Yi Mou, Jianfeng Lan, Jingyao Lu. 2026-08-30. Emerging Media Use and Acceptance of Digital Immortality: A Cluster Analysis among Chinese Young Generations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01355

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CY subject cs.ET subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Rights by Architecture: A Human-Compatible Sociotechnical Layer for Digital Protection Across Regulatory Regimes

Digital rights increasingly exist in law but remain difficult to exercise through the information systems that mediate them. Using disciplined conceptual synthesis and problematization, this critical-conceptual IS paper explains the gap through the interaction of legal heterogeneity, conflicting organizational and commercial incentives, fragmented architectures, and asymmetrical control over rights-relevant acts. It then theorizes a human-compatible rights layer: a governed sociotechnical capability for standardized, machine-readable, bidirectional, and jurisdictionally plural communication of requests, consent, refusal, withdrawal, objection, records, and support. Comparing California-style opt-out signals, the EU's mixed lawful-basis regime, and P3P, DNT, GPC, and ADPC, the paper derives seven normative requirements, develops rights by architecture as a bounded emancipatory policy argument, and treats a proposed GDPR provision on automated and machine-readable privacy management as a policy case for moving from banner-based compliance toward rights-supporting digital infrastructure.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Meeting the Coming Wave: The Emerging Politics of AI and Work across 33 Parliaments

A new politics of artificial intelligence and work is taking shape across party systems, but comparative politics has yet to map it. Using 1,514,950 parliamentary speeches from 33 parliaments (2023-2026), we show this politics follows a different logic than political economy expects. Research anticipates that technological disruption generates demands for compensation; instead, compensation accounts for just 2.3% of response-frame mentions, while enablement and investment dominate (55.2%), regulation and restriction follow (21.8%), and training (20.6%) appears at similar rates across families. Parties disagree instead over what AI means for work and how far this technology should be restrained. The mainstream and radical right support unrestricted enablement; the left is critical but divided on remedy. Social democrats stay adoption-oriented; greens split evenly. The radical left is the clearest force for restriction. The AI conflict thus concerns not compensation after disruption, but whether politics should enable technological change or govern its trajectory.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Agentic Workflow for Education: Concepts and Applications

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents, agentic workflows are showing transformative potential in education. This study introduces the Agentic Workflow for Education (AWE), a four-component model comprising self-reflection, tool invocation, task planning, and multi-agent collaboration. We distinguish AWE from traditional LLM-based linear interactions and propose a theoretical framework grounded in the von Neumann Multi-Agent System (MAS) architecture. Through a paradigm shift from static prompt-response systems to dynamic, nonlinear workflows, AWE enables scalable, personalized, and collaborative task execution. We further identify four core application domains: integrated learning environments, personalized AI-assisted learning, simulation-based experimentation, and data-driven decision-making. A case study on automated math test generation shows that AWE-generated items are statistically comparable to real exam questions, validating the model's effectiveness. AWE offers a promising path toward reducing teacher workload, enhancing instructional quality, and enabling broader educational innovation.

cs.CY↗