arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2504.09302

Application of Contrastive Learning on ECG Data: Evaluating Performance in Japanese and Classification with Around 100 Labels

Abstract

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a fundamental tool in cardiovascular diagnostics due to its powerful and non-invasive nature. One of the most critical usages is to determine whether more detailed examinations are necessary, with users ranging across various levels of expertise. Given this diversity in expertise, it is essential to assist users to avoid critical errors. Recent studies in machine learning have addressed this challenge by extracting valuable information from ECG data. Utilizing language models, these studies have implemented multimodal models aimed at classifying ECGs according to labeled terms. However, the number of classes was reduced, and it remains uncertain whether the technique is effective for languages other than English. To move towards practical application, we utilized ECG data from regular patients visiting hospitals in Japan, maintaining a large number of Japanese labels obtained from actual ECG readings. Using a contrastive learning framework, we found that even with 98 labels for classification, our Japanese-based language model achieves accuracy comparable to previous research. This study extends the applicability of multimodal machine learning frameworks to broader clinical studies and non-English languages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junichiro Takahashi, JingChuan Guan, Masataka Sato, Kaito Baba, Kazuto Haruguchi, Daichi Nagashima, Satoshi Kodera, Norihiko Takeda. 2025-04-12. Application of Contrastive Learning on ECG Data: Evaluating Performance in Japanese and Classification with Around 100 Labels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09302

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An Agentic Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Scientific Code in PETSc

While LLMs have accelerated scientific code generation, comprehensively evaluating generated code remains challenging. Many benchmarks emphasize functional correctness or task completion, which is insufficient for code built on production HPC libraries, where solver selection, API conventions, memory management, parallel awareness, and performance also matter. We introduce PETSCAgent-Bench, a multidimensional benchmark and agent-based framework for assessing whether AI-generated scientific code uses a production HPC library as an expert would. A tool-augmented evaluator compiles, executes, and measures code and combines deterministic checks with LLM-based assessments in a 14-evaluator pipeline spanning five categories: correctness, performance, code quality, algorithmic appropriateness, and library-specific conventions. A2A and MCP enable black-box evaluation of compatible coding agents. Across realistic PETSc problems, frontier models generate readable, well-structured code but struggle with correctness on challenging problems and with library-specific conventions even when code compiles and runs---limitations that conventional pass/fail evaluation does not capture.

cs.AI

TRUST-SQL: Tool-Integrated Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL over Unknown Schemas

Text-to-SQL parsing has achieved remarkable progress under the Full Schema Assumption. However, this premise fails in real-world enterprise environments where databases contain hundreds of tables with massive noisy metadata. Rather than injecting the full schema upfront, an agent must actively identify and verify only the relevant subset, giving rise to the Unknown Schema scenario we study in this work. To address this, we propose TRUST-SQL (Truthful Reasoning with Unknown Schema via Tools). We formulate the task as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process where our autonomous agent employs a structured four-phase protocol to ground reasoning in verified metadata. Crucially, this protocol provides a structural boundary for our novel Dual-Track GRPO strategy. By applying token-level masked advantages, this strategy isolates exploration rewards from execution outcomes to resolve credit assignment, yielding a 9.9% relative improvement over standard GRPO. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks demonstrate that TRUST-SQL achieves an average absolute improvement of 30.6% and 16.6% for the 4B and 8B variants respectively over their base models. Remarkably, despite operating entirely without pre-loaded metadata, our framework consistently matches or surpasses strong baselines that rely on schema prefilling. Data, code, and checkpoints are available at https://huggingface.co/collections/AIJian/trustsql.

cs.AI

How LLMs Follow Instructions: Skillful Coordination, Not a Universal Mechanism

Instruction tuning is commonly assumed to endow language models with a domain-general ability to follow instructions, yet the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Does instruction-following rely on a universal mechanism or compositional skill deployment? We investigate this through diagnostic probing across nine diverse tasks in three instruction-tuned models. Our analysis provides converging evidence against a universal mechanism. First, general probes trained across all tasks show selective rather than uniform deficits relative to task-specific specialists, indicating that representational sharing is partial and structured rather than global. Second, cross-task transfer is weak and clustered by skill similarity. Third, causal ablation reveals sparse asymmetric dependencies rather than shared representations. Tasks also stratify by complexity across layers, with structural constraints emerging early and semantic tasks emerging late. Finally, temporal analysis shows that the constraint signal becomes decodable only once generation is under way, and remains so throughout the response. These findings indicate that instruction-following is better characterized as skillful coordination of diverse linguistic capabilities rather than deployment of a single abstract constraint-checking process.

cs.AI