arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2504.09018

Entertainers Between Real and Virtual -- Investigating Viewer Interaction, Engagement, and Relationships with Avatarized Virtual Livestreamers

Abstract

Virtual YouTubers (VTubers) are avatar-based livestreamers that are voiced and played by human actors. VTubers have been popular in East Asia for years and have more recently seen widespread international growth. Despite their emergent popularity, research has been scarce into the interactions and relationships that exist between avatarized VTubers and their viewers, particularly in contrast to non-avatarized streamers. To address this gap, we performed in-depth interviews with self-reported VTuber viewers (n=21). Our findings first reveal that the avatarized nature of VTubers fosters new forms of theatrical engagement, as factors of the virtual blend with the real to create a mixture of fantasy and realism in possible livestream interactions. Avatarization furthermore results in a unique audience perception regarding the identity of VTubers - an identity which comprises a dynamic, distinct mix of the real human (the voice actor/actress) and the virtual character. Our findings suggest that each of these dual identities both individually and symbiotically affect viewer interactions and relationships with VTubers. Whereas the performer's identity mediates social factors such as intimacy, relatability, and authenticity, the virtual character's identity offers feelings of escapism, novelty in interactions, and a sense of continuity beyond the livestream. We situate our findings within existing livestreaming literature to highlight how avatarization drives unique, character-based interactions as well as reshapes the motivations and relationships that viewers form with livestreamers. Finally, we provide suggestions and recommendations for areas of future exploration to address the challenges involved in present livestreamed avatarized entertainment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Yin, Chenxinran Shen, Robert Xiao. 2025-04-12. Entertainers Between Real and Virtual -- Investigating Viewer Interaction, Engagement, and Relationships with Avatarized Virtual Livestreamers. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706370.3727866

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC