arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2504.00440

Algorithmic randomness and the weak merging of computable probability measures

Abstract

We characterize Martin-L\"of randomness and Schnorr randomness in terms of the merging of opinions, along the lines of the Blackwell-Dubins Theorem. After setting up a general framework for defining notions of merging randomness, we focus on finite horizon events, that is, on weak merging in the sense of Kalai-Lehrer. In contrast to Blackwell-Dubins and Kalai-Lehrer, we consider not only the total variational distance but also the Hellinger distance and the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Our main result is a characterization of Martin-L\"of randomness and Schnorr randomness in terms of weak merging and the summable Kullback-Leibler divergence. The main proof idea is that the Kullback-Leibler divergence between $\mu$ and $\nu$, at a given stage of the learning process, is exactly the incremental growth, at that stage, of the predictable process of the Doob decomposition of the $\nu$-submartingale $L(\sigma)=-\ln \frac{\mu(\sigma)}{\nu(\sigma)}$. These characterizations of algorithmic randomness notions in terms of the Kullback-Leibler divergence can be viewed as global analogues of Vovk's theorem on what transpires locally with individual Martin-L\"of $\mu$- and $\nu$-random points and the Hellinger distance between $\mu,\nu$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Simon M. Huttegger, Sean Walsh, Francesca Zaffora Blando. 2025-04-01. Algorithmic randomness and the weak merging of computable probability measures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00440

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO