arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.15670

Noise equals control

Eric De Giuli
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Stochastic systems have a control-theoretic interpretation in which noise plays the role of control. In the weak-noise limit, relevant at low temperatures or in large populations, this leads to a precise mathematical mapping: the most probable trajectory between two states minimizes an action functional and corresponds to an optimal control strategy. In Langevin dynamics, the noise term itself serves as the control. For general Markov jump processes, such as chemical reaction networks or electronic circuits, we use the Doi-Peliti formalism to identify the `response' (or `momentum') field $π$ as the control variable. This resolves a long-standing interpretational problem in the field-theoretic description of stochastic systems: although $π$ evolves backward in time, it has a clear physical role as the control that steers the system along rare trajectories. This implies that Nature is constantly sampling control strategies. We illustrate the mapping on multistable chemical reaction networks, systems with unstable fixed points, and specifically on stochastic resonance and Brownian ratchets. The noise-control mapping justifies agential descriptions of these phenomena, and builds intuition for otherwise puzzling phenomena of stochastic systems: why probabilities are generically non-smooth functions of state out of thermal equilibrium; why biological mechanisms can work better in the presence of noise; and how agential behavior emerges naturally without recourse to mysticism.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.MNcond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eric De Giuli. 2025-08-29. Noise equals control. https://doi.org/10.1103/vlx8-spc6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Thermodynamic and Statistical Signatures of Modality Changes in Concentration Distributions Driven by Stochastic Switching Between Two Activity States

Stochastic switching between gene expression states, coupled with production and degradation dynamics, governs the accumulation of mRNA and proteins in cells. The concentrations of these accumulated entities dictate the phenotypic distribution of genetically identical cells. The underlying accumulation dynamics are well-captured by a two-state promoter switching model, with statistical and thermodynamic properties quantified via the Fano factor and entropy production rates. However, how these measures correlate with concentration distributions and their shifts under varying kinetic parameters remains largely unexplored. To this end, we use chemical master equations to study a generalized model of mRNA accumulation dynamics in the presence of stochastic switching between two activity states and state-dependent production and degradation rates. We derive exact expressions for the steady-state probability distribution and analytically compute the mean concentration, Fano factor, and entropy production rate (EPR). Simplifying these expressions, we identify contributions arising from stochastic switching rates and relaxation dynamics toward equilibrium in each activity state. Next, using our theoretical results, we characterize the variation in the Fano factor and EPR as a function of mean expression during modality changes of the distributions mediated by the variation of switching rates. We also identify the conditions in kinetic parameters that achieve the highest Fano factor and entropy production rates. Our findings establish a generalized framework for examining stochastic accumulation dynamics, clarifying how kinetic parameters dictate molecular distributions, noise, and dissipation. These insights extend readily to broader contexts coupling stochastic switching with accumulation, including protein burst dynamics, phenotype-switching-mediated drug intake, and queuing theory.

q-bio.MN↗
arXiv2026

Are You Learning Biological Signal or Shortcuts? Auditing and Mitigating Bias in Protein-Protein Interaction Datasets

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) databases do not faithfully reflect biological realities. Instead, they are influenced by study and technical biases that distort certain protein and interaction attributes. Machine learning models can exploit these as learning shortcuts if the negative dataset is not constructed with care. So far, the shortcuts introduced during PPI dataset construction have only been examined in isolation. Here, we systematically characterize both reported and, to our knowledge, previously unreported biases in PPI datasets that lead machine learning models to learn shortcuts instead of biological signal. We analyze HIPPIE, IntAct, and STRING, dedicated PPI databases, as well as two datasets derived from 3D-structural information in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We show that random data splitting introduces strong topological shortcuts. When train-test protein overlap is removed, the resulting datasets still retain usable shortcuts stemming from self-interactions, taxonomic identity, and functional relatedness, whose prevalence interestingly depends on the data source. We further show that sampling negatives from a set of high-confidence non-interactors, an intuitively appealing choice, can amplify the shortcut stemming from functional relatedness. To detect and mitigate these biases, we provide an open Nextflow pipeline that combines similarity-aware, data-loss-minimizing dataset splitting with bias-minimizing negative sampling, both formulated as integer linear programs. Its key concept of quantifying biases to minimize them through optimization-based negative sampling can, in principle, be extended to any machine learning problem where the pool of negative candidates is much larger than the positives and is thus of interest also beyond PPI prediction.

q-bio.MN↗
arXiv2026

Obstruction of Absolute Concentration Robustness by Conservation Laws in Non-Redundant Zero-One Networks

Absolute concentration robustness (ACR) is a structural property of biochemical reaction networks in which a species attains the same steady-state concentration at every positive steady state, independently of initial conditions and rate constants. Existing detection methods rely on algebraic elimination and typically scale exponentially with network size. We develop a topology-based alternative for non-redundant zero-one networks of stoichiometric dimension at most two, a class that already captures enzyme catalysis, carbon-nanotube transitions, and other elementary biochemical mechanisms. Organizing our analysis around a structural index $s^*$, the number of distinct rows in the stoichiometric matrix, we obtain a complete classification of all such networks admitting non-vacuous ACR for generic rate constants. In dimension one, ACR occurs only for the elementary inflow and outflow module. In dimension two, ACR is possible if and only if $s^*\leq 3$; for $s^*=3$, the admissible networks are precisely those obtained as species refinements of consistent subnetworks of five canonical biochemical prototypes. For $s^*\geq 4$, non-vacuous ACR is impossible for any generic rate assignment.

q-bio.MN↗