arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2503.14233

Climate Risk and Corporate Value: Evidence from Temperature Bins and Panel Regression

Abstract

In empirical research, this article uses daily climate data provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States to construct a temperature box with a range of 5\( ^\circ\text{C} \), focusing on analyzing the impact of extreme high temperatures (\( >30^\circ\text{C} \)) and extreme low temperatures (\( \le -10^\circ\text{C} \)) on the asset value of enterprises. The results based on a panel regression model show that extreme high and low temperatures can significantly reduce the asset value of enterprises. In the robustness test, this article used lagged climate data for testing, and the results still showed that extreme high temperatures had a significant negative impact on the asset value of enterprises, verifying the reliability of the benchmark regression results. In-depth heterogeneity analysis shows that in the process of addressing climate risks, companies exhibit significant differentiation based on different ownership types and industry characteristics. According to research, state-owned enterprises are relatively less affected by extreme weather due to their resource advantages and policy preferences. In addition, foreign-funded enterprises demonstrate a high level of risk resistance due to their strong management efficiency and supply chain control capabilities. In the manufacturing sector, heavy industries such as steel and communication manufacturing are particularly affected by the negative effects of extreme weather, which fully demonstrates that these industries face more severe challenges when dealing with extreme weather conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bo Wu. 2025-03-18. Climate Risk and Corporate Value: Evidence from Temperature Bins and Panel Regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN