arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.08863

Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Bin Packing

Debajyoti Kar·Arindam Khan·Malin Rau
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study two fundamental three-dimensional (3D) geometric packing problems: 3D (Geometric) Bin Packing (3D-BP), and 3D Minimum Volume Bounding Box (3D-MVBB), where given a set of 3D (rectangular) cuboids, the goal is to find an axis-aligned nonoverlapping packing of all cuboids. In 3D-BP, we need to pack the given cuboids into the minimum number of unit cube bins. In 3D-MVBB, the goal is to pack them into a cuboid box of minimum volume. It is NP-hard to even decide whether a set of rectangles can be packed into a unit square bin -- giving an (absolute) approximation hardness of $2$ for 3D-BP. The previous best (absolute) approximation for both the problems follows from a result of Buchwald and Scheithauer (Int.~Trans.~Oper.~Res., 2016), yielding approximation ratios of $11$, and $5+\varepsilon$, respectively, for 3D-BP and 3D-MVBB. We provide improved approximation ratios of $6$, and $3+\varepsilon$, respectively, for the two problems, for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$. For 3D-BP, in the asymptotic regime, Bansal, Correa, Kenyon, and Sviridenko (Math.~Oper.~Res., 2006) showed that there is no asymptotic polynomial-time approximation scheme (APTAS) even when all items have the same height. Caprara (Math.~Oper.~Res., 2008) gave an asymptotic approximation ratio of $T_{\infty}^2 + \varepsilon\approx 2.86$, where $T_{\infty}$ is the well-known Harmonic constant in Bin Packing. We provide an algorithm with an improved asymptotic approximation ratio of $3T_{\infty}/2 +\varepsilon \approx 2.54$. Further, we show that unlike 3D-BP, 3D-MVBB admits an APTAS.

Explore related subjects

cs.CGcs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, Malin Rau. 2025-03-11. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Bin Packing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08863

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗