arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2503.04419

Cost-Distance Steiner Trees for Timing-Constrained Global Routing

Abstract

The cost-distance Steiner tree problem seeks a Steiner tree that minimizes the total congestion cost plus the weighted sum of source-sink delays. This problem arises as a subroutine in timing-constrained global routing with a linear delay model, used before buffer insertion. Here, the congestion cost and the delay of an edge are essentially uncorrelated, unlike in most other algorithms for timing-driven Steiner trees. We present a fast algorithm for the cost-distance Steiner tree problem. Its running time is $\mathcal{O}(t(n \log n + m))$, where $t$, $n$, and $m$ are the numbers of terminals, vertices, and edges in the global routing graph. We also prove that our algorithm guarantees an approximation factor of $\mathcal{O}(\log t)$. This matches the best-known approximation factor for this problem, but with a much faster running time. To account for increased capacitance and delays after buffering caused by bifurcations, we incorporate a delay penalty for each bifurcation without compromising the running time or approximation factor. In our experimental results, we show that our algorithm outperforms previous methods that first compute a Steiner topology, e.g. based on shallow-light Steiner trees or the Prim-Dijkstra algorithm, and then embed this into the global routing graph.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stephan Held, Edgar Perner. 2025-03-06. Cost-Distance Steiner Trees for Timing-Constrained Global Routing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04419

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS