Succinct Ambiguous Contracts

Paul Duetting; Michal Feldman; Yarden Rashti

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.02592

Succinct Ambiguous Contracts

Paul Duetting·Michal Feldman·Yarden Rashti

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Real-world contracts are often ambiguous. While recent work by D\"utting, Feldman, Peretz, and Samuelson (EC 2023, Econometrica 2024) demonstrates that ambiguous contracts can yield large gains for the principal, their optimal solutions often require deploying an impractically large menu of contracts. This paper investigates \emph{succinct} ambiguous contracts, which are restricted to consist of at most $k$ classic contracts. By letting $k$ range from $1$ to $n-1$, this yields an interpolation between classic contracts ($k=1$) and unrestricted ambiguous contracts ($k=n-1$). This perspective enables important structural and algorithmic results. First, we establish a fundamental separability property: for any number of actions $n$ and any succinctness level $k$, computing an optimal $k$-ambiguous contract reduces to finding optimal classic contracts over a suitable partition of the actions, up to an additive balancing shift acting as a base payment. Second, we show bounds on the principal's loss from using a $k$-ambiguous rather than an unrestricted ambiguous contract, which uncover a striking discontinuity in the principal's utility regarding contract size: lacking even a single contract option may cause the principal's utility to drop sharply by a multiplicative factor of $2$, a bound we prove to be tight. Finally, we characterize the tractability frontier of the optimal $k$-ambiguous contract problem. Our separability result yields a poly-time algorithm whenever the number of partitions of $n-1$ actions into $k$ sets is polynomial, recovering and extending known results for classic and unrestricted ambiguous contracts. We complement this with a tight hardness result, showing that the problem is \textsf{NP}-hard whenever the number of partitions is super-polynomial. Moreover, when $k \approx n/3$, the problem is even hard to approximate.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT econ.TH

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Paul Duetting, Michal Feldman, Yarden Rashti. 2025-03-04. Succinct Ambiguous Contracts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗