arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.16903

GuidedBench: Measuring and Mitigating the Evaluation Discrepancies of In-the-wild LLM Jailbreak Methods

Ruixuan Huang·Xunguang Wang·Zongjie Li·Daoyuan Wu·Shuai Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in jailbreaks as an effective red-teaming tool for building safe and responsible large language models (LLMs), flawed evaluation system designs have led to significant discrepancies in their effectiveness assessments. With a systematic measurement study based on 37 jailbreak studies since 2022, we find that existing evaluation systems lack case-specific criteria, resulting in misleading conclusions about their effectiveness and safety implications. In this paper, we introduce GuidedBench, a novel benchmark comprising a curated harmful question dataset and GuidedEval, an evaluation system integrated with detailed case-by-case evaluation guidelines. Experiments demonstrate that GuidedBench offers more accurate evaluations of jailbreak performance, enabling meaningful comparisons across methods. GuidedEval reduces inter-evaluator variance by at least 76.03%, ensuring reliable and reproducible evaluations. We reveal why existing jailbreak benchmarks fail to evaluate accurately and suggest better evaluation practices.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ruixuan Huang, Xunguang Wang, Zongjie Li, Daoyuan Wu, Shuai Wang. 2026-09-01. GuidedBench: Measuring and Mitigating the Evaluation Discrepancies of In-the-wild LLM Jailbreak Methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16903

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CL subjectcs.CR subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

OASIS: Optimizing Attacker Sequences for Hard-Label Black-Box Text Attacks

Different attack methods follow different search trajectories, they succeed on different subsets of samples, whereas existing hard-label black-box text attacks mainly focus on improving individual attackers or manually combining them. We present OASIS, a method for optimizing attacker sequences in hard-label black-box text attacks. OASIS first performs a one-time bi-objective attack chain search over candidate sequences to balance attack success rate and perturbation, and then reuses the selected fixed global chain during attack chain execution. Experiments across multiple datasets, victim models, and large language models show that OASIS consistently outperforms strong standalone baselines and simple manually constructed chains. These results suggest that attacker composition is not merely an implementation choice, but a practical optimization target for improving hard-label black-box text attacks.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Membership Inference in Fine-tuned Diffusion Language Models via Token-level Memorization Asymmetry

Diffusion language models (DLMs) have recently emerged as an alternative modeling paradigm to autoregressive LMs, offering advantages such as parallel generation and bidirectional context modeling. Despite growing interest in their generative capabilities, the privacy risks of DLMs remain underexplored. We identify a phenomenon termed token-level memorization asymmetry through theoretical analysis of diffusion training dynamics. Building on this finding, we propose Q-Skew, a quantile-weighted skewness-based indicator for membership inference on finetuned DLMs. Experiments across multiple fine-tuning datasets and models show that our method outperforms existing baselines. Moreover, we show that Q-Skew can also facilitate other privacy violations, such as PII extraction. Our findings reveal a previously underexplored privacy attack surface and highlight the need for systematic privacy evaluation of DLMs.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Securing Multi-Agent GIS Systems: Risk Evaluation and Prompt Hardening Optimization

Agentic systems are increasingly integrated with geographic information systems (GIS), where multi-agent coordination enables complex conversational and spatial analysis but introduces security risks. This work presents a security-oriented framework for risk identification, evaluation, and mitigation in a multi-agent GIS system while maintaining adaptability to broader agentic architectures. We test the agentic system of a commercial geospatial partner while developing a modular state-machine-based orchestration framework that abstracts agent behavior into reusable components. We evaluate robustness using a red-teaming framework with an adaptive attacker LLM and a deterministic judge that produces binary outcomes with supporting rationales across multi-turn attacks. We further improve resilience with a prompt optimization framework that treats prompts as structured signatures and injects adversarial demonstrations, enabling systematic security improvements without degrading task performance.

cs.CR↗